Subscribe via RSS Feed

Category: Opinion

Waltzing To Gomorrah

By Adrian Krieg | America is fast approaching the state of no return, if we have not already passed it, the stage where government is free to do anything it likes, and in which the citizens may only act with permission from government.

The Sheeple are restless, the Lamestream is clueless, and Disneyworld on the Potomac is run by AIPAC. We’re all quickly waltzing to Gomorrah lead by our pied-piper president, with his herding dogs the progressives, lead by Dingy Harry.

The endless list of continuous administration failures not-with-standing an American decline is made, the only reaming question is; will my published prediction of 2,000, “July 4th 2016 the Last Independence Day”[1] come to fruition as promised?

As of today the world is consumed by 62 nations involved in wars and 549 separate militias-guerilla and separatist groups causing havoc. Major conflicts that directly impact America are ongoing in Algeria, Angola, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt that is now a military dictatorship, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Libya, and were only up to the l’s. Some of these conflicts are religious and very dangerous. The developing Caliphate comprising part of Syria, and Iraq is a threat to the entire Muslim and Christian world, it is backed by our ally Saudi Arabia and the Emirates through the Wahhabi Sunni religious sect, which would like nothing better that an entire Middle East Caliphate.[2]

The situation with our southern border with Mexico is a president made catastrophe, when he in 2012 granted amnesty to illegal children who were to offspring of illegal immigrants most of whom were not born in America. The Mexican drug cartels that have been provided guns and ammo by our AG’s orchestrated Fast and Furious[3] cartel operation were quick to use the granted amnesty as a way to overload America’s border patrols with minors, turning the entitle border patrol into wet nurses. This has basically left the rest of the border unprotected allowing the drug cartels to expand their drug business; prostitution business and people transport business.

The IRS scandal seems endless, we now know after two years of stonewalling by a score of lying fired IRS commissioners, that this scandal is huge. Certainly the FEC[4] was more than just involved along with the Department of Justice and the White House. The IRS illegally transferred entire dossiers’ of personal information on conservatives and church groups to various agencies, an act punishable by fine as well as imprisonment, they were felonies’.

HourglassThe CIA was spying on the congressional committee in charge of oversight of the CIA, and the commissioner of the CIA Walter Brennan who has consistently lied to the American people and specifically to congress, a felons, is just one of a very long list of liars in Washington.
Benghazi also appears an endless quagmire, with the administration, the promised most open in American history, has tried to bury for two years. It will be the undoing of Hillary Clinton the liar who was responsible for the entire situation. Her continuous claims that she was not involved and that all decisions were made by subordinates without her knowledge indicates one of two things, either she is the worst administrator in history or she is a liar. The progressives whose darling she is, are pulling all the stops in her protection, the truth will come out and she will be toast.
The Mexican government obviously in collusion with Honduran, El Salvador and Guatemalan governments are jointly facilitating the drug cartels in their people smuggling business. The Government has done nothing to stop it.

While we have only listed major events due to space requirement of our publishers, it is a factual statement that the world is in a mess, illegal immigrants swamp America, our economy is in shambles, employment in numbers of private sector jobs is lower than it was in 2008, middle class income has fallen by over 10 % since Obama took office, government debt is the highest in our history, and all we get for Disneyworld on the Potomac is smoke and mirrors. Harry Reid has blocked up 352 House passed bills, 2/3rds passed with bi-partisan support refusing to allow the Senate to vote on any of them. The obvious response is why? The retort is simple they are legislation that he and the president oppose for purely political reasons and both Reid and Obama place politics miles before the nations benefit. Over half of them would pass in the Senate.

While all this transpires our president spends the bulk of his time fundraising at super PAC’s. The very venue’ he promised in 2012 not to use. In LA last week it was a $32,400 plate dinner at the home of Shonda Rhimes a Hollywood TV producer. For just $ 10,000 you can forego the dinner and niceties but have your picture taken with El Supremo. And we thought it was the Republicans that had all the money, it is one of the few places where you can pay over 30 grand and get a lecture on the need to increase the minimum wage. Same story is repeated in Seattle and a visit to Costco’s CEO, and then on to SF. But all this spans only one week, unfortunately for America it was a very busy week in international affairs, which were just overlooked. This week, beginning of August he’s on vacation again, what with all that strenuous fundraising he needed another vacation. Let’s give El Supremo a break he has only played 178 rounds of golf in six years, why that’s only 890 hours about 22 days of golf, aside that are the family vacations that cost taxpayers $1.4 billion in six years. This is a record for presidential travel. Records were stonewalled for some time; they were only released in March of 2014 under court orders. Between golf, vacations, and fundraisers there is hardly any time left to run the country, something that has become very obvious of late.

  1. ISBN 0-87319-047-5 Hallberg Pub. 2000, only from A2Z Publications
  2. The Caliphate traces its roots to Salah al din (Saladin) the Kurdish Islamist ruler who expelled the Crusaders from the Levant in the 11th century.
  3. BATF & FBI run gun smuggling operation to Mexico administered by the Department of Justice, about which Eric Holder lied to congress and was censured.
  4. Federal Elections commission previous employer of Lois Lerner, with lot’s of correspondence between the IRS & FEC

For more information go to: www.a2zpublications.com


There are no better people to run America than European American people. European peoples should be able to organize and advance their own interests just like every other group.


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support and maintain American Freedom Party growth and the spread of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to treasurer@american3rdposition.com or click here:

European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!


The Year of Remembrance vs. the Year of Death: 1814, 1914, 1944, 2014

Tom Sunic | Below is the English translation of my speech given on June 14, 2014 at a historic manor house, in the village of Guthmannshausen, in the vicinity of Weimar, the state of Thuringia, Germany. The speech was delivered on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the beginning of WWI, the 100th anniversary issue of the magazine Deutsche Militärzeitschrift (DMZ) and the monthly magazine of politics and culture ZuErst! whose host and editor in chief, Dietmar Munier, marked on that occasion his 60th birthday. This was a private event attended by approximately 150 people, mostly journalists and contributors to these journals, accompanied by their families.

* * *

Tom SunicEach anniversary year brings back memories of times past which one either wishes to revive for himself and his people, or administer to others as a political-pedagogical year of admonition. The German word “Gedenkjahr” cannot be easily translated into other languages, and often this word causes serious misconceptions among different nations. The word “Gedenkjahr” is translated into English or French as “memorial year” and as “jubilee year” — two completely opposing political notions. Depending on different nations, depending on their historical sentiments, an anniversary year can be memorized as hope, joy, and nostalgia. But it can also be used as an exhortation, a threat of punishment, or a fear-inducing tool. As far as our own anniversary year is concerned, we recall today our own life span and we enthuse about cheerful dates in our nation’s history. When celebrating one’s happy birthday, and if one, as an old man, still retains good memory, such as Ernst Jünger and Johann Wolfgang Goethe did, then one can say that life has some meaning.

When one is past his 60th birthday one needs to raise a question: “Why any more anniversaries?” The Franco-Romanian philosopher Emile Cioran, an ultra-nihilist and cultural pessimist, wrote that one shouldn’t live past one’s 40th birthday. On the occasion of his 70th birthday Cioran said that any further well-wishing for further life sounds grotesque to him. In an interview, in 1987, several years before his death, he said:” Within fifty years, the Notre Dame will become a mosque.”

By contrast, when hostile nations or groups commemorate the anniversaries of their political disasters, they are often inclined to use the buzz phrase: “Never again!” Commemorative years convert then quickly into symbols of the year of the dead and the days of admonition, especially when hostile nations and groups start cobbling together their endless anniversaries and present them as victimhood teachings at the expense of other nations.

Then things get serious. We all remember today the anniversary of the Vienna Congress of 1814 which redrew the state borders in Europe. We all remember the year 1914 which began with the new Thirty Years War in Europe, rushing in the era of mass killings and mass expulsions. Everything is fine and beautiful with anniversaries when no state of emergency looms on the horizon.

Such a linear and optimistic mindset, inherent to the modern System, comes directly from the Age of Enlightenment. However, it can get problematic. It prevents modern citizens from getting a full insight into the cyclical mindset of their ancestors. In our so-called enlightened and freedom-loving System, citizens are embroiled in bizarre infra-political anniversaries, in a number of hagiographical tales going back to the Second World War.

Consequently, any criticism of the official anniversaries of the System is interpreted as criminal or pathological behavior. How dare one criticize the “anniversary of democracy” or “the anniversary of human rights” without getting punished?

I hope our colleague Mr. Munier and the magazines DMZ or ZuErst! will continue providing us with superior educational material. We are badly in need of a new anniversary of a new Enlightenment and a new process of demythologization of our contemporary history. It is useless to keep complaining about the present intellectual climate, as is the case with many of our colleagues. Calculated pessimism is often an excuse for idleness and passivity. The course of history remains always open, offering to all of us new opportunities.

The problem arises, though, when a historical separation breaks into the course of time and when, consequently, all well-wishing turns into death wishes. Many once praised and well-known politicians, just as many great thinkers and writers from our history then become trademarks of horror and their names are used by the System in order to better highlight its own do-gooders. What would Europe be today without countless days commemorating the fascist scarecrow? Probably the European Union would come apart and its architects would become jobless. We tend to forget that there is a fine line between the anniversary day and the memorial day, between adulation and defamation, between life and death.

When a state of emergency occurs, or in other words when a historical upheaval sets in, then we all become witnesses of a tragedy, whereby this tragedy can cause a permanent political neurosis for a people. This was described by Carl Schmitt in his little book Hamlet or Hecuba, especially with his description of a sudden intrusion of political times into a relatively carefree and apolitical life. In other words, if tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, a state of emergency breaks into our fun-loving society, we will start commemorating differently our anniversary years.

Many of our acquaintances are not aware of such turning points in the flow of time. Many still believe in the theology of progress, in the Happy Ending where good always prevails. This is false. Only some of us, with a good sense of the tragic and with an extended sense of history can fully grasp it. We live without illusions. For example, in June 1941 the spiritual situation amidst the majority of Croats, on the occasion of the establishment of their new state was different from what it was in June 1945. In June 1945, Croatia disappeared from the map. In 1991, most Croats were full of joy with the re-emergence of their state, an event standing in sharp contrast to the present day situation with many Croatian citizens raising questions about any further utility of their state. Schopenhauer taught us that too much optimism always turns into its opposite.

The Culture of Remembrance

Another problem with anniversaries lies in their record keeping. After each upheaval new opinion makers always have the final word on the choice of the anniversary day. Many of today’s anniversaries are commemorated in the Federal Republic of Germany, but also elsewhere in the EU, as if they were to retain their permanent validity for all eternity. For the month of January we have the Holocaust Memorial Day, the Auschwitz Liberation Day (One can of course raise the questions as to what the Red Army had previously “liberated” in Pomerania or East Prussia on its way to the liberation of Auschwitz in January 1945). In December we celebrate Human Rights Day; then in March, the Women’s Day. In the U.S., Martin Luther King commemoration holiday falls also in January. Soon we will have to mark our wall calendars with Gay-and-Lesbian and Transvestite Days. Cat lovers and crocodile worshippers will soon be scrambling for the anniversary days of their pets.

We live in the culture of the museum, in the culture of remembrance, where lost tribes or exotic species from hidden parts of the world must be now commemorated. For example, in Germany and Central Europe there are sites dedicated to the now extinct Neanderthal species. In Croatia, close to where I live, there is a village with the Neanderthal museum, with the world’s largest collection of the remains of Neanderthal man. It must not be excluded that a state or a government from Northern Africa or the Near East will, in the following years, demand restitution from the Croatian or German authorities on the basis of their alleged relationship to the late Neanderthals and the alleged extermination of the Neanderthals by the Croatian and the Germanic homo sapiens. To be a German today means to be a good paymaster.

By contrast, many former anniversaries finish their journeys in collective oblivion. Who can remember the anniversary of the London drafted Beneš decrees of 1944, ratified in March 1946 by the new Czechoslovak government in order to legitimize the previous mass expulsions of millions of Germans? We have learned from our history that each beautiful anniversary can easily convert into a symbol of absolute evil. A heroic age can be reinterpreted by subsequent times as a terrorist age. Consequently, anniversaries are then no longer meant to be the days of anniversary celebrations, but instead they adopt the role of the Days of Warning. They serve as the basis for identity for the new ruling class. Thence, the new political and intellectual class builds up, in addition to its victimhood, its official demonology, whose arsenal is designated to induce fear, terror and self-censorship among citizens.

This is nothing new. We encounter evil incarnate among the ancient Greeks and their revenge goddesses, who are later followed by European witches of sorts. Today’s anniversaries are grandstandingly stylized by contemporary System politicians as fiery events, whereas ancient wisdoms are hushed up or put on display solely as symbols of absolute cruelty. The new Culture of Memory, designated by the System in regard to the Other, plays an extremely important role in today’s identity building process of the EU. The former German President Horst Köhler said in February 2005 in the Israeli Knesset that “the responsibility for the Holocaust is part of German identity.” Victimhood tutoring by non-European peoples has become a new civil religion of the West.

Böhse Onkelz

The Price of Freedom

Everything has its price. Free-thinkers, not to mention some uncompromising but rare academics in Germany and elsewhere in the EU, pay a high price for their daily bread. In fact, the DMZ and ZuErst! also cost money. But at least these journals have so far remained critical of the System. Ultimately, it all boils down to whether a journalist, a writer, or an academic is willing to collaborate with the System in order to secure himself and his family a cozy life, or whether he wants to live a life of an outsider. But even the line between cautiousness and self-censorship is often difficult to tell. Cautiousness may be cowardice. By contrast, power of decision making and courage to liberty often yield opposite results and can, in subsequent decades, have disastrous consequences for the younger generations. The young Hamlet and the young Faust were both sharp thinkers with a remarkable insight into the world of differently minded individuals, including for the differentiated Other. However, both were neurotics lacking any decision-making power. It was always the bad spirits who made the decisions in their stead.

The other type is a well- armed and combative hero, like the young warrior Siegfried from the Nibelungen Saga or the young Achilles from the Iliad. Both men had no fear of their premature and anticipated death because for both a sudden death meant eternal glory. But with their reckless, albeit well-intentioned conduct, they inflicted irreparable damage to their clans respectively.

I do not know which model to recommend. Maybe a mix between a courageous warrior and a poet? An Anarch with the Jüngerian lifestyle? We have already seen this type of man in our history. On the other hand, living a long and self-centered life of an expert idiot or a book worm, or as an old man constantly brooding over the lies of the System or bewailing his incontinence, is also a waste of time. To live as anonymous sheep without leaving any after-effects on his contemporaries is pointless. All things considered even the peaceful sheep usually die after 10 or 12 years, even though there might be no wolves in their vicinity.

Forty-two years ago I was also young, or maybe I was already way too old. I had also searched my memorial year as a hippy in India with my own “rapprochements,” my own “dangerous encounters,” and my own “radiations” without a penny in the pocket (Anäherungen, Eine gefährliche, Begegnung, Strahlungen. (These are allusions to Jünger’s essays — novels full of magical realism — as well as Jünger’s experiments with hallucinogenic drugs.) Fortunately, I learned early on that one could better fight the System when dressed in a good suit and decked up with a university degree than with long hair, tattoos and earrings.

I will close my speech with the verses from the Böhse Onkelz song, Der Preis des Lebens (“The Price Of Life”):

Der Preis des Lebens ist der Tod
Deshalb hab’ ich dich geholt
Du lebst für mich
Und jetzt nehm’ ich dich
In meine Arme, in meine Arme

(The price of life is death,
That’s why I’ve brought you in
You live for me
And now I’ll take you
In my arms, in my arms)

Ich mache keinen Unterschied
Zwischen Jung und Alt
Ob du arm oder reich bist
Läßt mich kalt
Ich heiß’ euch alle willkommen.

(I make no difference
Between young and old
Whether you’re rich or poor
Has no effect on me whatsoever
I’d like to welcome all of you!)

Dr. Tom Sunic is a member of the Board of Directors of the American Freedom Party. His new book Chroniques des temps Postmodernes (Avatar, 2014) has just been released.


There are no better people to run America than European American people. European peoples should be able to organize and advance their own interests just like every other group.


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support and maintain American Freedom Party growth and the spread of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to treasurer@american3rdposition.com or click here:





European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!


Quotes On The New World Order And One-World Government

1. “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.” Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.

2. “The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of “liberalism” they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” Norman Thomas, for many years U.S. Socialist Presidential candidate.

3. “Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government – a bureaucratic elite.” Senator William Jenner, 1954

4. “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991

5. “The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, l933

6. “The depression was the calculated ‘shearing’ of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market….The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.” Curtis Dall, FDR’s son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

7. “The New Deal is plainly an attempt to achieve a working socialism and avert a social collapse in America; it is extraordinarily parallel to the successive ‘policies’ and ‘Plans’ of the Russian experiment. Americans shirk the word ‘socialism’, but what else can one call it?” H.G. Wells The New World Order 1939

8. “Ultimately, our objective is to welcome the Soviet Union back into the world order. Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations.” President George Bush Texas A&M University 1989

9. “Under Socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not the character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner. . . .” Fabian Socialist Bernard Shaw in his Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism, 1928.

10. “We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” Mikhail Gorbachev 1987

11. “National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order.” Adolph Hitler during World War II

12. “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” President Woodrow Wilson 1916

13. “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” – Henry Ford

14. “The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.” – Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets

15. “Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” – David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405

16. “It is the system of nationalist individualism that has to go….We are living in the end of the sovereign states….In the great struggle to evoke a Westernized World Socialism, contemporary governments may vanish….Countless people…will hate the new world order….and will die protesting against it.” – H.G. Wells, in his book, “The New World Order”, 1940

17. “To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.” – Brock Adams, Director UN Health Organization

18. “We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. . . Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. . . . We must electronically control the brain. Someday armies and generals will be controlled by electronic stimulation of the brain.” Dr. Jose M.R. Delgado, Director of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical School, Congressional Record, No. 26, Vol. 118, February 24, 1974.

19. “One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order.” From The National Educator, K.M. Heaton

20. “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” – David Rockefeller

21. “No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.” David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

22. “Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.” Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

23. “The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.” Nelson Rockefeller, New York Times, February 1962

24. “The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” Franklin D. Roosevelt, letter to Col. House, November 21, l933


There are no better people to run America than European American people. European peoples should be able to organize and advance their own interests just like every other group.


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support and maintain American Freedom Party growth and the spread of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to treasurer@american3rdposition.com or click here:





European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!


How Trade Wars Shaped Early America, Part 1

By: Dr. A. H. Krieg | Libertarians are most usually people who represent a somewhat confused idea on issues of trade based on their absolute liberal philosophy. We don’t really disagree with much of that, but Mr. Bovard seems to us not to understand the basic concepts of free markets. He begins his article with an attack on “Fair Trade” which he allies to the political “Left”. Then goes on to say that the “Left” is desirous of implementing trade restrictions, i.e. protectionist trade policies. Fair trade has always been a nationalist topic, and is not of the political left, and trade issues are not as simplistic as free or fair trade.

Fair Trade is in fact not of the political left but from the Nationalist political norm. Regardless of what Mr. Bovard seems to postulate on trade we strongly suggest letting the facts speak for themselves, rather than a discussion of labor costs in various economies.

Past history relating to trade is in basis irrelevant because means of production worldwide have drastically changed since the latter part of the 20th century. The international consolidation of manufacture as multinational in nature is the cause of this.

Firstly it is important to understand the reality of 21st century manufacture. Facts are indisputable, and they in part consist of the reality that in this time all manufacturing is done on similar machinery regardless of the geographic region in which it takes place. The cause of this is, that today most manufacture is carried out by multinational corporations, whose only interests lie in producing whatever product they make at the lowest possible cost, and to sell it in the world economy at the highest possible profit. This reality causes five factors to come into play for American producers. 1) The cost of labor (A) and 2) the cost of government regulatory burden, (B) and 3) the price of taxes in the manufacturing location. (D) Lastly 4) in the case of America Tort law (5) which ads about 15% to the cost of manufacturing in America. (C) Libertarians conveniently forget these issues in order to advance their political philosophy.

I will produce only one international issue to support my case that Mr. Bovard is completely wrong. Beginning in the late 70’s the progressives and their allies the Libertarians began arduously pushing “Free Trade” as an American policy relating to international trade. I will not even bother to list all the false claims made on behalf of the issue, and restrict myself to the eventual outcome with only one nation, Mexico.

NAFTA[1] was proposed to the DEC[2] in the late 80’s. By 1990 it was solidified within the political parties enjoying by-partisan support. It was and always has been opposed by over 85% of the general population. This is why it was passed as an agreement and not a treaty. Enacted in 1992 with considerable opposition within the many DEC’s it took effect in 92. The agreement is written in two books 8 ½ by 11 inches single spaced with pages unnumbered the first is 1½ inches thick the other 1¼ inches thick. So it consist of over 1,000 pages and what it states is: NAFTA is an agreement between Canada, Mexico and the United States and shall reduce all tariffs to 0 in ten years at the rate of 10% per tariff per year. That in effect is all that the over 1,000 pages boils down to. This poses only one question; how have we done with NAFTA? In 1992 America had a $5.7 billion trade surplus with Mexico, over the coming 10 years that rapidly changed to a deficit topping out to $62.6 billion in the tenth year. Over the total time of the ten years America lost $ 548 billion.

The really serious effects of this free trade agreement did not come to fruition until the third year. NAFTA requires that the USDC provide an annual report of NAFTA at the end of each year. When president Regan read the 3rd year report he ordered it shredded, and every American president since has ordered the reports not to be published. We know exactly why. The third year report stated that America was rapidly losing manufacturing capacity with plant closings and many moving to Mexico. This rapidly accelerated. By 2014 we have lost 11.7 million manufacturing jobs and 56,000 small manufacturing enterprises. American middle class income began to stagnate and in the last decade years has steadily fallen. The great promise that the consumers good would become less expensive was an illusion, today the goods are more expensive, mostly made overseas or in Mexico, and the worker now employed in flipping hamburgers at minimum wage rather than in manufacture earing four times more, getting less and spending less.

  1. North American Free Trade Agreement
  2. District Export Councils of the USDC (there are about 40 of these in America most have about 14 to 18 members.)
    1. Cost of labor: USA is 100. Norway, Switzerland, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Austria, Finland, Holland, France, Iceland, Canada, Italy and Japan are from 181 to 101 above all others are below. Multinationals only manufacture consumer goods is special cases in those nations. In the case of large items (cars, tractors, boats etc.) most parts are subcontracted to third world nations. (BLS)
    2. Cost of government regulation USA is now at $62 billion annually and that is new regulations for 2014 alone. (OMB) (SBA) lists it at $1.7 trillion annually. While the EU has larger regulatory burden placed on manufacture we are rapidly overtaking the EU under Obama’s regulatory expansion.
    3. American tort law is the bane of all manufacture the average cost of product liability insurance in America is between 10 and 15% of the production cost.
    4. America has the highest corporate tax rate in the industrialized world.

Dr. Krieg is a doctor in manufacturing science and is a certified manufacturing engineer (SME) He was an advisor to the US Department of Commerce for 15 years under various administrations, from 1982 to 1995.


There are no better people to run America than European American people. European peoples should be able to organize and advance their own interests just like every other group.


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support and maintain American Freedom Party growth and the spread of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to treasurer@american3rdposition.com or click here:





European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!


Notes on the Institution of Marriage

Nelson Hultberg | In today’s rapidly disintegrating, “do-your-own-thing” culture, our pundits, professors, and judges are in desperate need of some powerful doses of rationality. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the conflict over the institution of marriage and what its definition is to be. What follows are several insights that hopefully will clear up some egregiously warped notions being bandied about by America’s “intelligentsia.”

In a free and ordered society (which is what those of us on the political right maintain as the ideal) the defining of marriage cannot be left up to individual whim. It must be defined by the predominant institution of authority in society, which in our day is the state while in earlier times it was the church.

Why is this so? Because if adult individuals were allowed to freely define marriage as they see fit, polygamy and the building of harems would soon become part of the cultural landscape, various besotted hippies would be requesting licenses to mate with their pet dogs or horses, and certain sicko men would demand to hook up with their 18-year old nubile daughters.

MarriageContrary to what Rousseau’s modern progeny believe about the “innate goodness and rationality of man,” there are millions of innately crude and animalistic humans in this world, and there always will be. In the absence of a government definition of marriage as an institution (on the state level), these distasteful humans would instinctively seek to flaunt their egos especially in today’s culture of rampant moral relativism.

History and the intractabilities of human nature tell us it is not possible to make marriage a purely voluntary endeavor devoid of authoritative definition and licensing. A rational society enshrines rules to define its fundamental institutions; it does not allow human whim to dictate their structure. These rules, society’s intellectuals glean from a synthesis of reason, experience, and intuition down through the centuries. We call this synthesis “right reason,” i.e., the practical wisdom that society’s foremost thinkers hand down to us. If our thinkers do their job right, they teach the people what these rules are, which then manifests in a free and ordered society via democratic vote and federalism.

Many libertarians will object to the above reasoning, for they espouse the right of individuals to partake in whatever is peaceful and does not infringe upon the rights of others. Thus they maintain that individuals should be allowed to define marriage as they see fit. But do these same libertarians object to the state prohibiting close relatives from marrying? I know of none who do, even though such a marriage act is “peaceful.” Thus wise men and women conclude that prohibitive marital definition on the part of society is sane and logical. Under our system of “Lockean federalism” the states need to define what a marriage is.

Freedom of Association

As for the present brouhaha over same-sex marriages instigated by today’s gay and lesbian community, it would not be an issue in a truly free society in which government was properly (i.e., constitutionally) limited – in other words where individuals were free to associate or not to associate. It is only because gays and lesbians have gained the power through the courts to force their acceptance in the various social interactions of humans that they are now demanding to have “same-sex unions” equated legally with “heterosexual marriage.” In a society that was free to voluntarily accept and reject its associations, homosexual citizens would no longer have the ability to mandate their acceptance (i.e., sledgehammer their lifestyle into social approval). Consequently, they would have to become sexually discreet again. Their demand to equate same-sex unions with heterosexual marriage would dissipate in face of the more important need to get along in a society that had the right to freely approve or disapprove.

This is a perfect example of why the right to “freedom of association” is so important in the maintenance of a free and ordered society. Once any group – be it racial minorities, females, or homosexuals – gains the ability to legally mandate its automatic acceptance by everyone else (i.e., overrule the right to freedom of association), then there is no longer an adequate check on the customs, practices, and lifestyles permitted in that society. Whatever humans can dream up and descend into will then develop among the members of that society, and they will relentlessly push for its inclusion into what is accepted by the dominant authorities of the culture. This is the nature of humans. They have a tendency to partake in whatever will not incur disapproval from their fellow humans. The freedom not to associate is one of society’s forms of disapproval. Liberals denounce it and legislate against it, but it is a very natural and needed disapproval in the preservation of cultural order.

Today’s chaos of values is primarily the result of the moral relativism that has seeped into the teachings of our intellectuals over the past 90 years. But to a certain degree, it is also the result of our abandonment of the fundamental right to “freedom of association” in society. This abandonment has created open season for any and all lifestyles, no matter how bizarre and irrational, to manifest themselves.

Does this mean that gays and lesbians are second-class citizens and can be treated with contempt? Of course not. They are humans with the same rights as heterosexuals, and they deserve to be treated with the same respect and civility that one conveys to all other human beings. But they do not have the right to legislatively mandate their acceptance. Whatever acceptance in society they are to gain must come voluntarily through reason and persuasion.

The Natural Order

Historically the conflict of values between hetero and homosexual humans has always been solved through the practice of discreetness. Homosexuality is tolerated in a civil society as long as it is not flaunted and does not attempt to establish “alternative lifestyle” status via judicial coercion. Quite simply, gay and lesbian sexuality is different from straight sexuality. It is not an alternative; it is an unnatural form of sex because it does not, in the words of legal philosopher Robert P. George, fulfill the “two-in-one-flesh communion of persons that is consummated and actualized by acts that are reproductive in type, whether or not they are reproductive in effect (or are motivated, even in part, by a desire to reproduce).”

This is the defining characteristic of marriage validated by the wisdom that has been handed down through thousands of years of human history: Marriage is a merging of two persons consummated by reproductive type acts. Gay and lesbian sexuality does not engage in reproductive type acts. Thus it is not an equal union to that of man and woman and therefore not a marriage. It goes back to Aristotle’s famous Law of Identity: A is A, B is B. A thing is what it is because of its nature. A rock can never be an orchid. And a “gay union” can never be a “heterosexual marriage.”

There is a natural order in existence, and government should not be used to coerce people into accepting a disorder or a lie. For example, the Federal Reserve’s fiat paper money can never achieve parity with a gold dollar. Government’s legal tender laws mandating that paper money must be considered the same as gold are an attempt to codify a lie into fact. Such self-deception can only bring decay and derision throughout society. The same applies to a government mandating that homosexual unions must be considered the same as heterosexual marriages by the country’s citizens. A deviation from the norm can never have parity with the norm.

Obviously gays and lesbians have a right to equality under the law, but this means only that they have the same right as all other citizens in society to form a “contractual union” and have it upheld by the law. It does not mean they have the right to coerce their fellowman by judicial decree into accepting such a union as a “marriage.” Marriage has, for thousands of years and for very sound reasons, been legally defined as between opposite sexes. Judges do not have the right to change this; only the people do.

We must understand that much of legality is dictated by “cultural mores” manifesting in majority approval. Both conservatives and libertarians are very concerned with the concept of “individual rights” as a foundation of our laws, but conservatives understand that individual rights do not dictate all laws in society.

For example, the freedom of citizens to form contractual unions is dictated by the concept of individual rights. But the legal definition of such contractual unions is dictated by our cultural mores manifesting in a vote of the people. Thus judges cannot dictate which unions are to be defined as marriages, for individual rights are not involved. Our cultural mores will decide this via right reason and majority vote. In other words, there is no such thing as a legal right to have one’s associations defined in a specific way. Our culture will determine who is to be defined as “married,” not our courts.

Moreover, if gay men and lesbian women are allowed to codify their unions into “marriages” because of feelings for each other, then so also should straight men with each other and straight women with each other. Why should not any pair of friends be allowed to “legally marry?” But as a society we don’t legalize this. The institution of marriage is, by the laws of nature, a union of a man and a woman. To extend it to every conceivable pairing of humans desecrates its spiritual link, its rational purpose, and its practical necessity. Such obtuse egalitarianism is insane.

We as a people must come to grips with what Jefferson termed the “natural aristocracy” that is inherent in human existence, i.e., the hierarchy of disparate achievement that individuals will bring about when left free. Life’s earnings, relations, status levels, economic results, and positions of power cannot be “equalized” in society. We all have imperfections that we must learn to live with. My imperfect mug can never have parity with Cary Grant’s; I must accept this and build my life voluntarily in accord with the Constitution and the traditional mores of civilization discerned by “right reason.” Gays and lesbians must do likewise with their imperfect sexual orientation. Freedom mandates this. To blank out on such a truth, as our reigning pundits and professors are doing today, is to destroy the vital spiritual-ideological glue that cements the infinite variations of humanity into a free and cohesive society.

[This article is based upon an excerpt from Nelson Hultberg’s book, The Golden Mean: Libertarian Politics, Conservative Values.]

—————–
Nelson Hultberg is a freelance scholar/writer in Dallas, Texas and the Director of Americans for a Free Republic www.afr.org. His articles have appeared over the past 20 years in such publications as The Dallas Morning News, American Conservative, Insight, Liberty, The Freeman, and The Social Critic, as well as on numerous Internet sites such as Capitol Hill Outsider, Conservative Action Alerts, Daily Paul, Canada Free Press, and The Daily Bell. Email him at: hultberg@afr.org


There are no better people to run America than European American people. European peoples should be able to organize and advance their own interests just like every other group.


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support and maintain American Freedom Party growth and the spread of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to treasurer@american3rdposition.com or click here:





European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!


The Political Dialogue Today

By Dr. A. H. Krieg | While I probably knew it all along, I have come to a clear understanding of the anomalous way that people of this century form their opinions. When I was a youth, news came from books, newspapers, radio and magazines. News agencies were neutral and did not try to politically influence their readers and listeners. I guess that lets you know I’m an old codger. Things began to change after WWII, when the media realized through the efforts of Dr. Goebbels and then after the war, the Tavistock Institute just how simple it was for the government using “Lamestream media” to control a society.

Today, in the 21st century the media and government have a political objective. They desire to control the political dialogue, and through the use of every available propaganda means, direct the people to the political and social ends that they want.

This really came to light for me in the last few weeks through conversations and meetings. Virtually all of the people with whom I spoke expressed their opinions in short bumper sticker slogans, which I immediately recognized as coming from one of three sources, the DNC or RNC, and Government, as expressed by the TV media outlets that they watched. I can at this point tell you for whom they will vote based solely on what TV channels that they subscribe to watching. Needless to say all the news sources produce the same crap at the same time, using the same or similar language, provided to them by the New world Order.

The Democrats have expanded their efforts mostly through personal attacks on individuals, or slander from the house and senate floor, whose speakers are immune from slander laws, when speaking from Congress. Senator Harry Reid (D. Nevada) is the poster boy for this effort. I have also become aware that the political left, as were their communist forbearers are the most active and abrasive. As a non-member of either Republocrat Party I really don’t have a ball in this game, I am but an observer.

The Hegelian Dialectic as expounded by the German Philosopher Friedrich Hegel has been used by the political left especially the communists, ever since Karl Marx used it in furthering his theory. The dialectic is simply a means used as a framework to channel thoughts and ideas to a predetermined solution. In other words the dialectic is a clever way to guide and direct debate, thereby to force a predetermined outcome of an event. The use of this diabolical system by news agencies is controlling the national political debate. It is a truly totalitarian effort that is in basis undemocratic and Marxist. To this effort they have added the propaganda omission of information, which has been most apparent in the Benghazi and IRS investigations, while Fast and Furious has been swept into the dark hole of historic omission.

The new whipping boys for the DNC, Dingy Harry, and the progressives are David and Charles Koch, the Koch brothers, whose names are always mispronounced. Harry Reid calls them the world’s greatest polluters and the world’s wealthiest men. On the list of the worlds wealthiest, they are number 12. Bill Gates who is number one is a huge DNC contributor, as are Tim Gill, George Soros, both give more and exclusively to the DNC and leftist causes. And then, to set things right the DNC has more millionaires and billionaires as funders than any other political party. The Democrats are the party of the rich. The DNC just had a dinner at $35,000 per plate in LA in which speakers lauded the Democrats for inclusion of the masses, we all do understand that that’s more for dinner than most Americans earn. In the 2012 election cycle three-quarters of all DNC funding $61 million was for amounts over $250,000 per contributor, only 5% of DNC funding came from contributions under $ 100,000. And as far as pollution goes – the US government out-pollutes the Koch brother’s business enterprises by over 3000 times.

The Discoverthenetworks.org lists all the political organizations and left wing causes that George Soros funds, a full list is on the Internet. 189 listed beneficiaries of Soros money, eight of which are affiliates of the Soros networks. The list of names is absolutely diabolical; almost every one of them has a patriotic or neutral name, “Center for Progressive Leadership”, “The Urban Institute”, “The Sojourners”, “The Secretary of State Project”, and so forth. Even the pro-homosexual, and anti-Christian SPLC is on the list. If it’s on the political left, or is communist or socialist, Soros has his greasy fingers in it.

The new development in this century has been the climate as a weapon for social and political control. Socialists long ago, in the last century found out that they could not sell socialism to Americans. They developed a four-point strategy, which has been with help of the “Lamestream Media,” very successful. 1) Education had to be federalized and totally top down controlled, the last step in that is Core education. 2) They had to develop some means that could be employed to control society, manufacture, and every other sector of society, “Global Warming”, was it. When it was then revealed that the earth climate had actually fallen in every of the last 15 years they changed it to “Climate Change”. 3) They had to convince the population that the economy under their control was actually improving, and that they therefore should all, be re-elected. 4) Healthcare has to be nationalized because it allows government control of the population (Obamacare).

The third point has been bought hook line and sinker by Democrats, environmentalists, and educators, or as some say, low information voters. This is done through misinformation of government provided statistics. Through the omission of relevant data statistical and germane information is published that has no relevance in reality. A compliant media distributes such information at disservice to everyone.

The most egregious media sources are in order of complicity MSNBC, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, and lastly FOX. I am appalled by the lack of journalistic ability displayed in this jaudra. This all goes back to education and colleges that teach journalism. Most professors in journalism are leftists, they teach journalism because they failed in the private sector media industry and then decided to teach. The function in a venue’ wherein the student who agrees with the professor, regardless if he is right or wrong gets A’s, and the student who disagrees with the professor gets a C-. Under such a system, journalists are not made. YES men are made. The graduates of these schools are valueless because they will not challenge or oppose the put forth dictums of the ruling class. Thus the boss, no matter how wrong, is obeyed to the letter. No question is ever posed!

The largest percentage of reported miss-information stems from Washington and New York. New York is the financial arm the other, the political arm. The population is induced through repetitive pronouncement by all the agencies of media to believe what they are told, regardless of how ridiculous it may be. Some examples may be of use. Let me point out that “pakalertpress.com” lists all the 659 lies that Obama has told in the last six years 95% of which were reported as fact by the Lamestream.

Unemployment is now reported as 6.3% everyone even fourth graders know this is bogus. Real unemployment when you count everyone is 37.2%.[1] The just reported reduction in unemployment statistic for this month claimed 255,000 new jobs, and then omitted the fact that 880,000 people were taken off the unemployment lists, and that just over 188.000 new people came on the job market. This actually indicates that this month we had a 831,000 shortfall of jobs. In actual fact these number are all estimates because the government (IRS) does not release the number of employed and they are the only agency that knows. More jobs do not necessarily mean more people are employed because the average month produces 188,000 new job seekers. And lastly, lower unemployment numbers do not necessarily mean that less people are unemployed because long-term non-employed are not counted anywhere. 47 million on food stamps reveals the fallacy of the unemployment numbers. The 6% rise in federal government employment and 5% fall in private sector employment further skew the reported numbers.

When we examine the statistical employment numbers, the actual numbers of people who have jobs, we see that from the day of Obama’s inauguration to today 58.7% of Americans are employed, the lowest percentage number ever recorded. It indicates that 41% of the population is either unemployed, retired, on welfare, on disability or has no interest in attaining employment.

Real median household income has fallen in every of the last six years at an average rate of just under 2% annually. The rate of inflation has averaged about 11% annually when all commodities are included. The total number of employed Americans has declined each of the past six years and is now over 800,000 lower than in 2009.

I just must add — the real estate market as reportedly “doing well” is another lie. In today’s local paper we have the listings of delinquent property taxes for Manatee county FL. 21 pages 50 listings per page for 8,400 delinquencies. Manatee County has 82,936 homes and condos that indicates that 9.873% of property owners have not paid their taxes, which were due in Jan 2014.

[1] David John Marta wealth management

Read Dr. Krieg’s new book “The System” from all booksellers ISBN 978-1-937553-06-7


There are no better people to run America than European American people. European peoples should be able to organize and advance their own interests just like every other group.


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support and maintain American Freedom Party growth and the spread of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to treasurer@american3rdposition.com or click here:





European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!


AFP Gains Momentum In Indiana and Mississippi

American Freedom Party is making strides throughout the country. One of our latest additions is a seasoned young activist and Civil War Re-enactor from Indiana and Mississippi.

Our new Mississippi coordinator joined the American Freedom Party because he strongly believes that “the Democrats and Republicans no longer represent the interests of our people. The American Freedom Party finally gives our people a voice in elections. Together, we can make a difference.” Current or prospective members from this region are encouraged to contact the Party leadership and contact the Mississippi Party Coordinator directly. Send An Email.

Mississippi State Coordinator

(National President of the Confederate Patriot Voters United)
Brian Pace
P.O. Box 43
Baldwyn, MS 38824
Send An Email

The Indiana State AFP coordinator is actively recruiting members and coordinating party meetings. Contact the Indiana Party coordinator. Send An Email.

Mid-West AFP Indiana Coordinator
Indiana
Send An Email

Contact them directly by email or by post.


There are no better people to run America than European American people. European peoples should be able to organize and advance their own interests just like every other group.


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support and maintain American Freedom Party growth and the spread of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to treasurer@american3rdposition.com or click here:





European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!


Is Immigration Really A “Jewish Value”?

GOP House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s ominous squishiness in the face of the Amnesty/ Immigration Surge drive, which has provoked a primary challenge from Economics professor Dave Brat, may be due to personal greed, but Jewish organizations clearly think he can be motivated by ethnic appeals. A friend recently forwarded me this email (links in original except where noted):

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, March 24, 2014

CONTACT: Emma Stieglitz, emmaS@berlinrosen.com, (646) 200-5307

BEND THE ARC MARSHALS JEWISH VOTERS TO PRESSURE ERIC CANTOR ON IMMIGRATION REFORM

Jewish voters are ratcheting up the pressure on Majority Leader Eric Cantor to move comprehensive immigration reform [VDARE.com note: a.k.a. Amnesty/Immigration-Surge] through the House. On Monday, Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice launched a petition calling on Rep. Cantor to bring immigration reform to a vote. The effort, spearheaded by Bend the Arc, is a collaboration of many of the nation’s leading Jewish organizations.

The petition (at www.entrydenied.org) makes clear that immigration reform is a priority issue for the Jewish community:

“As American Jews, we believe in a nation that grants today’s immigrants access to the same basic freedoms and opportunities that drew our ancestors and yours.”

Israeli Border

Jewish organizations are unanimous in support of the Amnesty/ Immigration Surge drive. This support for liberal immigration laws has a long history—the granddaddy of them all being the 40-year campaign to enact the 1965 immigration law that opened the door to heavy immigration of all the peoples of the world.

But what is striking is that Jewish immigration enthusiasts have portrayed themselves as motivated entirely by a set of ethical values that are unique and central to Judaism. Thus Bend the Arc proclaims:

We are building a national movement that pursues justice as a core expression of Jewish tradition….Jewish tradition is about liberation and love for humankind. We believe in the dignity and inherent right of all people to live in a just, fair and compassionate society. As Jews immigrated to America, this belief was stowed in their luggage. Throughout American history, courageous Jews have worked with others to hold the nation to its promise, whether in the abolitionist movement, the anti-sweatshop movement, the movement against child labor, the modern labor movement, the civil rights movement or the movement for LGBT inclusion (just to name a few).

And it boasts:

Over the past year, Bend the Arc has organized around the issue of immigration, arranging meetings between Jewish leaders and congressional staff, hosting immigration-themed Shabbats, organizing petitions and participating in marches, vigils and town halls to deliver the message that immigration reform is a top priority for Jewish voters. In October, Bend the Arc’s rabbi-in-residence was arrested at a national demonstration for immigration reform alongside members of Congress during an act of civil disobedience on the National Mall.

A similar wall-to-wall Jewish lobbying effort in California is aimed at limiting deportations of illegal aliens. Again, their motives are the purest:

“Is immigration a Jewish issue?” [a California Assemblyman] pressed skeptically.

[Rabbi Larry Raphael of Congregation Sherith Israel] answered, “We believe it is.”

[Jewish Values at Heart of Immigration Reform, by Rachel Heller Zaimont, Jewish Journal, February 12, 2014]

An April 2 Google search for ‘immigration “Jewish values”’ resulted in over 81,400 links to a wide range of Jewish organizations, including the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (which is deeply involved in recruiting African refugees for resettlement in the US), the American Jewish Committee, the National Council of Jewish Women, and the Union for Reform Judaism.

Clearly, from the mainstream Jewish perspective, swamping the historic American nation with peoples from all over the world is nothing less than a moral imperative. The tacit assumption: Jews are ethically superior—motivated by a unique set of specifically Jewish values that make them support displacement-level immigration into Western societies.

Here’s another recent example:

We are compelled to act because we remember our core story: We were strangers in a land that was not our own. The imagery of the Exodus and the Jewish story of immigration and rejection, of landlessness and powerlessness, continues to animate us and guide our consciousness of the fate of others. We have experienced the pain that comes from the separation of families, of closed borders, of inhumane immigration policies. Because Jewish memory is both eternal and inspirational, we believe that we must act to achieve immigration reform. We are proud to bring our own set of values to the forefront as we stand beside our many partners in the Asian, Latino and other faith communities on behalf of the undocumented and to seek justice for immigrants in California and throughout the United States.

[Jewish Values Inspire Immigration Reform, Jewish Journal, by Rabbi Ron Stern, May 22 2013]

Given that these sentiments are so central to the mainstream Jewish community in the US, you would expect that Jews in Israel would welcome immigrants from Africa and elsewhere with open arms.

But of course you would be wrong. African immigrants are mistreated, rounded up, and deported. Even African Jews have been subjected to a variety of indignities, including being given long-acting Depo Provera birth control shots.

Some American Jews are willing to say frankly that their interest is in Israel remaining a Jewish state, which would be compromised by African immigration. An Orthodox rabbi explains:

Rationally, though, we recognize that every nation must place limits on the number of foreigners who wish to reside there. … In a country with approximately six million Jews, and over a million Arabs, the character and culture of the Jewish state will be diluted once a critical mass of non-Jews is allowed to permanently reside there. If the gates are completely open, Israel can be overrun with another million or more foreigners—non-Jews who do not share the values and destiny of the Jewish people, and the Jewish State will begin to evaporate. Obviously, the Torah recognizes limitations on a non-Jews’ right to live in the land of Israel.

[Jewish Values Online, undated]

Would that analogous sentiments had been permitted in America in 1965, when it was 90% White and a self-consciously Christian, European-derived civilization!

To anyone with even a passing acquaintance with Jewish history, the idea that a unique set of universalist ethical values defines Judaism would be surprising indeed. The traditional self-concept of Diaspora Jews was that the rewards of keeping the faith and obeying religious regulations will be many descendants (“I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the seashore,” [Gen. 22:17]), a return to power, wealth and prosperity in Israel, and the destruction or enslavement of Israel’s enemies.

Rather than a universalist ethic, traditional Jewish ethics made strong distinctions in the morality of actions depending on whether Jews or non-Jews were involved. For example, radio personality Dennis Prager describes the results of asking 10 Talmudic scholars about returning an item acquired as the result of an error by a non-Jew:

Suppose you ordered an electric shaver from a store owned by non-Jews, and by accident the store sent you two shavers. Would you return the second shaver?

Nine said they would not. One said he would.

What is critical to understand is why they answered the way they did. The nine who would not return the second shaver were not crooks. They explained that halachah (Jewish law) forbade them from returning the other shaver. According to halachah, as they had been taught it, a Jew is forbidden to return a lost item to a non-Jew. The only exception is if the non-Jew knows a Jew found the item and not returning it would cause anti-Semitism or a Khilul Hashem (desecration of God’s name). The one who said he would return it gave that very reason — that it would be a Khilul Hashem if he didn’t return it and could be a Kiddush Hashem (sanctification of God’s name) if he did. But he, too, did not believe he was halachically bound to return the shaver.

The nine were not wrong, and they were not taught wrong. That is the halachah. Rambam (Maimonides) ruled that a Jew is permitted to profit from a non-Jew’s business error.

Can Halachah ever be wrong?, January 11, 2012.

Returning the item because of fear of anti-Semitism is hardly a principled moral position along the lines common among Western philosophers. Thus Immanuel Kant’s “Categorical Imperative” commands that one act only if one would accept such an action as a universal law. But for the Talmudic scholar, including the one who returns the shaver, the Jewish ingroup retains a morally privileged position. This is without parallel in Western philosophy.

In fact, traditional Jewish law had different penalties for a variety of crimes depending on whether or not one was a Jew—not only taking advantage of business errors, but theft, rape, and murder (reviewed in Ch. 6 of my A People That Shall Dwell Alone). The Jewish law of slavery was highly elaborated—Jews owned and traded slaves throughout history, until the practice was banned in the 19th century as a result of anti-slavery movements originating in Western societies. But there were very clear differences between the recommended treatment of Jewish and non-Jewish slaves, much to the detriment of the latter. Even proselytes who had converted to Judaism had a lower moral standing than other Jews—a fact that has doubtless weighed heavily with prospective converts in traditional societies.

Israel Shahak, the late Israeli Zionism-skeptic, provides many examples of the different moral status of Jews and non-Jews. For example,

Sexual intercourse between a married Jewish woman and any man other than her husband is a capital offense for both parties, and one of the three most heinous sins. The status of Gentile women is very different. The Halakhah presumes all Gentiles to be utterly promiscuous and the verse “whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue [of semen] is like the issue of horses”40 is applied to them. Whether a Gentile woman is married or not makes no difference, since as far as Jews are concerned the very concept of matrimony does not apply to Gentiles (“There is no matrimony for a heathen”). Therefore, the concept of adultery also does not apply to intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman; rather, the Talmud 41 equates such intercourse to the sin of bestiality. (For the same reason, Gentiles are generally presumed not to have certain paternity.)[From Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years (1994)]

Shahak provides several similar instances from the rabbinic literature in which offending words were altered in the interests of political expediency, only to be restored in more recent times in Israel because the rabbis had become confident that they would not result in persecution.

Shahak concludes that the nationalist ethics of Judaism survives in the contemporary world:

Anyone who lives in Israel knows how deep and widespread these attitudes of hatred and cruelty to towards all Gentiles are among the majority of Israeli Jews. Normally these attitudes are disguised from the outside world, but since the establishment of the State of Israel, the 1967 war and the rise of Begin, a significant minority of Jews, both in Israel and abroad, have gradually become more open about such matters.

In recent years the inhuman precepts according to which servitude is the “natural” lot of Gentiles have been publicly quoted in Israel, even on TV, by Jewish farmers exploiting Arab labor, particularly child labor. Gush Emunim leaders have quoted religious precepts which enjoin Jews to oppress Gentiles, as a justification of the attempted assassination of Palestinian mayors and as divine authority for their own plan to expel all the Arabs from Palestine.

Given the ingroup morality of traditional Jewish society, whence this self-image of American Jews that they are following a universalist ethic that commands them to admit tens of millions of non-whites into countries established and (precariously now) dominated politically and culturally by whites?

I mentioned Kant above because the origin of this Jewish self-conception was a reaction to Kant’s writing on Jews. According to Kant, writing in 1793, the Jewish community had excluded

from its communion the entire human race, on the ground that it was a special people chosen by God for Himself—[an exclusiveness] which showed enmity toward all other peoples and which, therefore, evoked the enmity of all

(Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, 1793).

Kant perceived Judaism as a national/ethnic movement with an ideology of eventual political reunification of its dispersed members. He wrote:

Judaism is really not a religion at all but merely a union of a number of people who, since they belonged to a particular stock, formed themselves into a commonwealth under purely political laws, and not into a church; nay, it was intended to be merely an earthly state so that, were it possibly to be dismembered through adverse circumstances, there would still remain to it (as part of its very essence) the political faith in its eventual reestablishment.

(Emphasis in original).

In other words, Kant understood that Jewish ethics were essentially national self-interest rather than anything having to do with ethics as he understood it. And because Kant was so prominent, Jews regarded his views as threatening. Jewish reformers quickly took up the intellectual challenge of remaking the intellectual basis of Judaism in a manner that would appeal to Western intellectuals. As John Murray Cuddihy noted in his Ordeal of Civility:

These Diaspora groups were uninterested in actual history; they were apologists, ideologists, prefabricating a past in order to answer embarrassing questions, to outfit a new identity, and to ground a claim to equal treatment in the modern world. [P. 65]

The result: a new emphasis among these Jewish reformers on purely religious faith as the moral basis of Judaism. Sermons and intellectual defenses of Judaism now focused not on the minutiae of ceremonial law or on the eventual reestablishment of a Jewish political entity, but on ideals of virtuous behavior.

As Michael A. Mayer put it in his Response to Modernity: A History of the Reform Movement in Judaism

Thus, instead of being the religion of no morality—as Kant defined it—the Reformers sought to present Judaism as the religion most exclusively concerned with morality, and hence most worthy of the future.

Because of the critical importance of morality, there was an attempt to reinterpret passages from Jewish religious writings that represented a doubtful morality—a project which is of continuing interest in the modern world. An influential example: prominent German-Jewish philosopher Moritz Lazarus (1824–1903) who, according to Ismar Schorsch in his Jewish Reactions to German Anti-Semitism, 1870-1914, published

…a classic apologia of Judaism under emancipation, successfully expunging every trace of the particular, the irrational, and the historical from what Lazarus held to be the essential unity of Jewish ethics [P. 73]

(This earned him the condemnation of Orthodoxy). In Lazarus’s reconstruction, the essence of Judaism was its belief in “the oneness of God, the oneness of the world, and the oneness of humanity.” “God acknowledged as One, beside whom there is no other, cannot be national. . . . [This concept of God] so illumined, with its purity and sublimity, the soul of the Jewish people that Israel was fitted to become a ‘light of the nations’.”

This historical revisionism was completely successful. By the middle of the 20th century, Jewish self-conceptions, particularly among Reform Jews and secular Jews, were completely shaped by the self-image of universal moral idealism. For example, in remarks on a 1961 Commentary symposium of “Jewishness and the Younger Intellectuals,” Norman Podhoretz, described the contributors as

Believing (on the basis, it should be emphasized, of an obviously scant acquaintance with the literature and history of Judaism) that the essence of Judaism is the struggle for universal justice and human brotherhood, these young intellectuals assert over and over again that anyone who fights for the Ideal is to that degree more Jewish than a man who merely observes the rituals or merely identifies himself with the Jewish community”

(Emphasis added).

“Scant acquaintance with the literature and history of Judaism” indeed!

Call me cynical. But the way I see it is that overtly nationalist ethics are alive and well in Israel, as it rids itself of African migrants and systematically oppresses the Palestinians via ethnic cleansing and apartheid, while in the U.S. and elsewhere in the Western Diaspora the organized Jewish community and most Jewish intellectuals pose as enlightened universalists. (Right now liberal Zionists are tying themselves in knots trying to justify Israel in the face of the pro-Palestinian Boycott Divestment and Sanctions movement.)

This tactic is effective because Europeans are peculiarly susceptible to appeals to morality—the flip side of the tendency for Whites to absolutely horrified when labeled a “racist” or “White supremacist” because they oppose immigration or for other contraventions of Political Correctness.

A basic strategy of progressive intellectuals in the Diaspora has been to frame the dispossession of Europeans as a moral imperative because they are quite aware that such rhetoric is the coin of the realm in the West (and nowhere else). For example, New York-based Rabbi Marc Schneier, President of the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding and Vice-President of the World Jewish Congress, stated in March of 2011

If Europe wants to remain true to its ethical and spiritual foundations, it must embrace people from different cultures, religions and ways of life. If not, it will not only fail as a concept, it will lose its soul. In Paris, Muslim and Jewish leaders pledge to stand together against the rise of extreme-rightist parties, European Jewish Press March 9, 2011]

But these activists exempt Israel from a similar moral obligation to efface its ethnic basis as a Jewish state.

But when we get beyond the smokescreen of such hypocritical moral posturing, we should be aware of the real ethnic interests involved: Diaspora Jewish groups in the West see themselves as benefiting from displacement-level immigration because it lessens the power of the White majority. The “lesson of the Holocaust,” as perpetrated by a homogeneous, racially conscious society, looms large. As Leonard Glickman, president and CEO of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society once put it, when asked why his organization was importing Somali Muslims: “The more diverse American society is the safer [Jews] are.”

Indeed, the image that homogeneous, racially conscious White societies are fundamentally morally depraved has become the central cultural theme throughout the West—the white race being the cancer of human history, in Susan Sontag’s famous phrase.

Disoriented by this constant drumbeat, Western peoples have been defenseless against their own disempowerment. They can only begin to defend their legitimate interests when they challenge the hypocrisy, and historical inaccuracy, of Jewish immigration enthusiast claims to a unique, and imperative, moral vision.

Kevin MacDonald [email him] is professor of psychology at California State University–Long Beach and a frequent contributor to The Occidental Observer. For his website, click here.


There are no better people to run America than European American people. European peoples should be able to organize and advance their own interests just like every other group.


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support and maintain American Freedom Party growth and the spread of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to treasurer@american3rdposition.com or click here:





European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!


FairVote Supports Proportional Representation

Krist Novoselic II, perhaps best known for his years as Nirvana’s bassist, is doubling down behind the organization FairVote.org for an alternative fix for Washington: proportional representation.

Novoselic, who sits on the group’s board, spoke to POLITICO about how FairVote’s proposed changes to how politicians get elected could fix Congressional gridlock.

“If you give people a winner take all system, they can do block voting and this majority will just sweep all the seats,” Novoselic said. “What we’re doing with FairVote is we’re promoting American forms of proportional representation. So, imagine a three seat district and voters get one vote to elect three seats. … What would be the effect of that? The majority would elect somebody, but the minority would elect somebody, also. So you would have districts, with say, two Republicans and one Democrat or two Democrats and one Republicans.”

Novoselic said that plan wouldn’t disperse the vote, but instead spreads it around so different kinds of voters get a chance to elect somebody.

”That means rural Democrats and rural Republicans. You would have more southern Democrats … and you would have more northern Republicans.”

Novoselic and FairVote have been at this for decades, but that doesn’t mean he’s pessimistic.

“I came out of the alternative music world. I remember in the 1980s, like ‘What’s this alternative music stuff?’ And it took the world by storm. We just needed to tell people.”

And that is part of the problem; whereas many people place the blame for inaction firmly at the feet of career-preserving politicians, Novoselic says the people need to play more of a role.

“A lot of it has to do with awareness. People don’t really know about fair representation voting, that we have these alternative voting systems in the United States.”

And for those politicians nervous about changing the voting system, Novoselic says there’s something in it for them, too.

“Democrats have just given up on all these Democratic voters all across the nation … They’re just trapped [in Republican districts].” (Novoselic said the same was true for Republicans). “There’s a lot of space for new ideas and people are looking for new ideas right now because Congress is broken, people are frustrated. When I was in a band in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, we came out of this grunge, alternative world. We never thought we were going to be on MTV or a huge band. But things change.”


European peoples should be able to organize and advance their own interests just like every other group.


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support and maintain American Freedom Party growth and the spread of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to treasurer@american3rdposition.com or click here:





European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!


Metapolitics, Paganism & European Identity

Tom Sunic (Tomislav Sunic) is an author, translator, former Croatian diplomat and a former US professor of political science. Mr. Sunic has published books, essays and newspaper articles in French, German, English and Croatian on subjects of cultural pessimism, politics, metapolitics and European identity. We’ll hear about the ideologies of what has been coined as the “European New Right,” (Nouvelle Droite) co-founded by the French philosopher and academic Alaine de Benoist. We converse about diversity, race, sociobiology and egalitarianism. Tom explains why The European New Right, embraces paganism as the only reliable way out of the Judeo-Christian based political systems. Later, we approach White racial issues and factors contributing to pathological White guilt, self denial and self censorship. Sunic talks about the dire need for Europeans to proudly embrace their ancient European pre-Christian culture and identity. We end the hour on the America Freedom Party.



The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support and maintain American Freedom Party growth and the spread of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to treasurer@american3rdposition.com or click here:





European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!


Top