Subscribe via RSS Feed

Category: Opinion

Inept American Middle-East Foreign policy

Dr. A. H. Krieg | We never really had hopes and aspirations for Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, but never in our wildest dreams did we ever consider the present catastrophic situation. Hillary’s qualifications for the position of Secretary of State are not all that un-similar to those of Barack Hussein Obama’s for the presidency mediocrity seeks accomplices. Neither person has the appropriate background or training for their present employment as has become painfully obvious in the last three and a half years.

America’s foreign policy has been the product of “Study Groups” at the Council for Foreign Relations; whose quarterly published “Foreign Affairs” is CFR’s lead publication. Foreign Affairs normally telegraphs what the intended policies relating to various issues are to be for the immediate future. 68th street or if you prefer the Pratt House in NYC has been the primary source of American foreign policy since FDR’s presidency. A subtle change began with the inclusion of many AIPAC (American Israeli pubic Affairs Committee) members occurred in the late 50’s. America’s zionist and Likud directed Israeli/American dual nationals participation in CFR as well as the Middle East desks of the State Department, in the late 50’s simply exploded. Israel became a nation in 1948, directly after Harry Truman accepted a $500,000 gift from Jewish donors to the DNC for the recognition of Israel as a nation. America then recognized Israel as the first nation in the world to do so.

Middle East MapAs background, it is imperative for the reader to realize that Palestine which was previously independent and after that an adjunct to the Byzantine Empire never had a Hebrew population exceeding 15% of the total regional population. Likewise important is the fact that in WWI the Turkish empire Ottoman Empire was allied to Germany. The British commander General, later Marshall Allenby, was at a standstill in Palestine against the Ottoman Turks. England was tied up in Europe and Allenby had to find a means to increase his military strength and thus made a treaty with the Palestinans to become allied to the British Empire. The price of that was the granting by the British crown to Palestinans self rule and nationhood in perpetuity if the Ottomans were defeated. With his new Palestinian allies Allenby quickly defeated the Ottoman Turks.

The situation for England after the war (WWI) was almost a bad as for the Germans. England was broke. They had two options, they could borrow funds from the Americans the richest nation in the world or they could borrow money from Lord Rothschild the richest man in the world who also happened to be the president of the World Zionist Federation. The Crown not wanting to be in perpetual foreign debt settled on Rothschild, who after all had purchased a title making him a British Lord. There was just one little string Rothschild demanded and received, the Ballfour Declaration, named after lord Ballfour that granted Jews the right to settle in Palestine. O, yes, the exact same real estate the British had granted to the Palestinans, an agreement whose ink was still wet. A small but pertinent side issue is that England never once owned a square inch of Palestine and had no right to give it to anyone.

These are little historic facts conveniently lost to the zionists managing American foreign policy along with annalists at the CFR, as well as State. It is however one of two unrelated but important issues underlying the entire Middle East situation. The second of them being that well over 95% of the Jews living in Israel and settling in Israel are Ashkenazi converts to Judaism that came from the Caucuses where they were driven out by the indigenous population after their conversion to Judaism in the 6th to the 8th century AD. Theses converts eventual settled in Prussia, Poland and Eastern Russia, where they gradually became the scourge of the region. So hated were they that over 150 city-states eventually banned them. They’re rabbinical (lawyers) who had replaced the original Jewish (Hebrew) priest class (Kohanim) that were hereditary, were eliminated by the Rabbis who then came to be exclusively Ashkenazi (convert) Jews. While all this information can easily be verified in the Jewish encyclopedia is conveniently buried in history just as is the Allenby treaty.

Now lets understand that American foreign policy is now produced in Jerusalem, or might as well be, because all the actors at CFR and State are Ashkenazi Jews, most of whom are dual nationals. Into this conundrum we introduce one other factor. Erez Yisrael translated is Greater Israel it stems from the zionist movement that began with Theodor Herzel the first president of the World Zionist Federation, (1897) but only came to notice in the 1960’s and 70’s when Likud and zionists became enthralled with expanding Israel to take over the entire Middle East. Regardless of the validity of this movement, it is huge and every Arab alive is cognizant of it, thus making it an enormous factor in Middle East politics. Erez Yisrael according to zionists and Likud consists of: Palestine, Gaza, The West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq to the Euphrates River and north to the Turkish Border, and the Egyptian Sinai to about the Suez Canal. Even a small child can see that this is ridiculous it is a region whose population is over 15 times that of Israel and a land mass equally larger.

Also overlooked is the fact that the Ashkenazim have absolutely no territorial or property rights in the entire Middle East, being Jewish converts that originally resided in the Caucuses, and thereafter in Europe and never anyplace in the Middle East.

Now that we have exposed the historic facts that are hidden by the media we are able to objectively address the issue of American foreign policy as articulated by the Obama administration, Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, and president Obama. Notwithstanding that they are inheritors of a system put in place by FDR and begun by president Wilson at the turn of the 20th century. The aggressive stance taken by AIPAC since the 1948 establishment of Israel and its recognition by president Truman has simply sealed the issue. Beginning in the 50’s Jewish influence in American foreign policy began to accelerate and by 1960 had mushroomed into becoming the major factor influencing American political decisions relating to the Middle East. By 1990 AIPAC was the dominant actor, more accurately director of American Middle East policy. By the 90’s all Middle East desks at State were headed by Israeli dual nationals and American foreign policy became directed for the sole benefit of Israel and to the detriment of America.

Meanwhile in NYC the CFR had also succumbed to the same sort of takeover by which Jewish interests now dominated most CFR study groups especially those with issues relating to the Middle East. This was in no small way helped by the NY Times, and the NY media giants of ABC. CBS, NBC, Newsweek, Time, US News and World Report, and the Washington Post etc. who are owned or controlled by identical interests. The underlying issue for all those zionists is always Eretz Yisrael, it being the driving force of Israeli policy and thus also American foreign policy. How is this possible? There are scores of Israeli, zionist funded think tanks and policy institutes whose faux intellectuals dominate the political policy scenes in Washington as well as NYC. Some of these are: The New Jerusalem Foundation financed by Moshe Talansky of LI, NY a 501 (c) (3), Project for a new American Century, Washington DC, head by William Kristol, ACRP Ariel Center for Policy Research, BSCSS Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, GLORIA The Global Research in International Affairs Center, INSS Institute for National Security Studies, ITCT The International Institute for Counter Terrorism, IPF Israel Policy Forum, JINSA Jewish Institute for Security Affairs, SRI Stephen Roth Institute, Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace, INCUR Institute for Jewish & Community Research, IDI Israel Democracy Institute, JPPPI Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, Myers-JC-Brookdale Institute, Traub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel, Van Leer Jerusalem Institute, The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, and of course the ever predominate AIPAC.

These organization in concert with the “lamestream media” many of whose leading editors and publishers are members of one or more of the aforementioned organizations, control the dialogue, and thus policy instituted by our as well as that of Israel’s governments. Likud (The war party) is the primary representative of zionism in Israel and therefore is the Israeli operator of these policies. The fact that many of these organizations share personnel with CFR as well as State is a well-known fact. Thus Jewish think tanks develop policy introduce it to the Study Groups at CFR, that then is furthered by State as American foreign policy. The primary and most obvious issue now relates on the fulcrum of who is favored by these zionist produced polices. Zionists as well as Jews will tell you that they are one and the same, that in fact policy beneficial to Israel is policy advantageous to America, nothing could be further from the truth.

Israel has a well-known internationalist outlook based on several tenets. Not least among those is the fact that the entire communist movement was Jewish in foundation and management and that the communist movement was always internationalist. The fact that zionists are Reformed Jews is not to be overlooked because reformed Jews most definitely are in violent opposition to conservative and Hassidic Jews that in many cases are arduously opposed to zionism. These tenets are; in order of importance, Eretz Yisrael, Israeli hegemony over the entire Middle East, removal of all non-Jews from Gaza and the West Bank, the expulsion of Christians and Muslim from, Lebanon, Jordan, most of Iraq, Syria, The Sinai of Egypt, and a portion of Saudi Arabia. This horrific pipe dream is at the root of all Middle East turmoil. It has been the driving force of American and Israeli foreign policy since 9-11. It is without question the reason for all the turmoil in the Middle East.

Centering on American policy, but clearly understanding where it is made, we can now examine the social political situation of the Middle East, as it now exists. The fact that external to established government’s rule influences have been the driving force behind recent changes in the Middle East as well as in America which is undeniable. What I am saying is that the “Arab Spring” is an entirely foreign introduced invention in all of the nations that have succumbed to these revolutions, which are no more homegrown than the Russian revolution was. The agitation for radical change worldwide has been and remains totally nondescript in that the revolutionary’s direction and what the resulting change is to be, is always hidden from view. In Russia it was a Jewish takeover of the state and in the Middle East almost 100 years later it is a Jewish organized destabilization of opposing government’s (Lebanon repeatedly) in order to allow the Eretz Yisrael hegemony to come to fruition. The degree by which America, and American military has been employed by the Jewish mini-state is undeniably awesome.

The primary problem with these zionist induced foreign policies is that they are disadvantageous to American interst. Before Israel we had no enemies in the Middle East now we have no friends. And as seen in the past few months the actions have not been particularly advantageous to Israel either. In Egypt the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the most strongly opposed to an Israeli state political faction, is on the verge of taking control of the goverment. In Libya that had a strong anti-Western government but an authority that was very beneficial to the population has become anarchy without any legitimate operating government. Syria is in the midst of a foreign agitated and US, British and Israeli militarily supported insurrection that if successful in toppling the Assad regime will result in the same sort of anarchy as Libya with the caveat that all the minority Christian and Alawite mebers of that nation will suffer the fate of the Christians in Egypt. Now with a substantial Russian military presence as well as Turkish naval presence the shift to Russia by Syria is imminent. Good Job Hillary! Iraq in which America’s surrogate war against a stable and long lasting government has resulted in three million refugees, one million deaths, horrific cancer explosions due to depleted uranium munitions by America, the situation could not be worse. Open hostility toward America is now commonplace and the average Iraqi will tell you without prompting that he was far better off under Sadam Hussein than under the present government.

After the departure of the larger American military units thing began deterioration all over Iraq. The situation is now one of civil war. The Construction of a 104-acre, $750 million 15,000 employee American embassy in Baghdad, which I choose to call Hillarie’s folly, is the pinnacle of extravagance and American imperialism. It represents the largest foreign mission of any nation in world history. We can’t really blame the lady she does as she it told to do. I simply wonder whom the idiot is that came up with the idea, and even more so who approved it, have we now embarked on Eretz America? Is this embassy to be the center of American and Israeli hegemony in the Middle East? As usual our State Department and its edicts produced on 68th st. issued from the 7th floor leave us with more questions than answers.

Read Dr. Krieg’s books available at www.a2zPublications.com


Systems Functions or Pervasive Republocrat Pronouncements

Dr. A. H. Krieg | Yesterday on April 3rd Mitt Romney made a very telling statement that was overlooked by most. He said, ”If it had not been for Ross Perot, Clinton would not have been elected”. It was a direct attack on A3P American Third Position Party. If there is one thing that terrifies the Republocrats it’s the development of a strong third party to challenge their political monopoly.

Consequentially they have relentlessly turned their attack dog on us. They have through surrogates attacked our Web Sites, personal CV’s of our directors, added misleading and false information to our Wikipedia sites, slandered us as racist, not based on any facts, but simply because we support White people as well as Christians and lastly linked us with people and organizations that we have absolutely nothing to do with. This from a political system one of whose parties has just announced an emotional appeal for African Americans for Obama, could you imagine the outcry of an A3P announcement of Caucasians for Merlin Miller?

As a board member of A3P I have the opportunity to speak with many people relating to America, our party position on issues, and the present state of affairs in America. Without question the most commonly expressed opinion is, “I can’t vote for a third party, Obama could be re-elected” I have heard this more times than I could possibly count, it is the major issue prevalent among the political right. Furthermore it has been part of the landscape for the last five presidential election cycles. It is a specious argument brought to us by the Republocrats; it is not based on fact but a prevailing misnomer. If America does not develop a strong third political party the nation is doomed. A furtherance of the Republocrat system will destroy America by 2016. I, in fact wrote about this 12 years ago in a book titled “July 4th 2016 the Last Independence Day”.

Let me make an educated guess, Romney will be the Republican candidate for the presidency because the RINO’s want him to be the candidate, and after all they are the people with all the money, and that’s what it takes to run a successful campaign. Additionally, Romney has non-descript policies on almost every issue, appears to have no core beliefs, and in the last ten years has been on virtually every side of every issue. He represents the ultimate candidate in that citizens will see in him what they want to see in him. Not really that unlike Obama.

What Is Romney all about? Well, he is about universal government supplied healthcare; after all, Romenycare in Massachusetts is the fundamental foundation for Obamacare. What about the second amendment, here again there is no disenable difference between Obama and Romney, Massachusetts having one of the most restrictive gun laws in the nation. On Economic and energy issues we have no idea what his policies might be because he has articulated none, all he has said repeatedly is that he differs from Obama, question being how? More hope and change one might imagine. I’m sorry to bring this up all the time but George Wallace had it right. ”There’s not a dimes worth of difference between them”. Free Trade is another issue and here again the prevailing position of all Republocrats is that free trade is beneficial for America, this regardless of the fact that we have lost over 10 million jobs, 43,000 manufacturing plants and are operating an economy with trade deficits of hundreds of billion of dollars every year. Ross Perot articulated that one with, “The Great sucking sound” which by this time is no longer a sound but a roar.

So in our opinion, the variance between Obama and Romney will at most be minimal. On core issues they are not far apart, issues in which they differ are not of great importance. The fact of the matter being, that both candidates for 2012 are instruments of the system and will do as they are told, the upcoming electoral Punch and Judy show is solely for the entertainment of the voters who will be induced primarily based on false and misleading sound bites to support one of the two puppets. Neither of these political parties have American core beliefs, they are only interested in their party members re-election and their continuation of slopping up the taxpayers provided taxes, something in which they have had an 87% success rate. They stay in power by transferring the wealth of those who labor to those who loaf. As all socialist schemes, this will work, until those who provide, run out of money, at which point the system simply implodes.

The German philosopher Hegel clearly explained this in his Hegelarian Dialectic, which in uncomplicated terms is; in order to force an issue you promote two differing opposing arguments both far to either side. The majority of people will then consider both issues as being extreme and the (System) producer of the two positions will then present a center-produced position, which is the system position. The fact that no considered question has only two possible solutions is of course never brought up. In this manner the system is always successful in achieving their desired outcome.

A3P is decidedly different. We have no corporate donors; we do not take money from labor unions, foundations, bankers or think tanks, we do not operate political slush funds to slander our opponents, we have no professional politicians running for anything. It has been our experience that professional politicians are crooks at best and incompetent in their legislative actions at worst. We are outsiders not subject to the Hegelarian Dialectic; we solely present our own position not influenced by any outside forces.

A3P has produced a book that lists America’s problems and appropriate solutions to those problems. No other American political party has done this. “Our Vision for America” ISBN 078-1-937553-05-0 by Merlin Miller our presidential candidate, which is available from all book sellers, or A2Zpublications.com specifically addressees all the issues that impact us today, and offers many solutions to those very problems. Even if you are a stalwart Republocrat supporter don’t you at least want to see what alternatives we recommend? A small cost of only $10.00 will suppress your curiosity, If you like the book consider getting copies for your friends and relatives, you will by these actions be supporting the American Third Position and helping your children and grandchildren to escape the Republocrats debt machine that is gradually forcing America into bankruptcy and destroying your offspring’s future.

Just one more item. Evidence is now in, that the mainstream media in collusion with the Republican Party RNC is fixing elections nationally. Case in point, South Carolina computes all votes electronically. The following network TV sources, NBC, CBS, FOX, ABC, and PBS all reported Romney wins with only 1/3rd of 1% of votes cast at virtually the same time, CNN followed two minutes later. The total number of votes cast at the time of the announced Romney win was 2381 votes. It is mathematically and statistically impossible to predict the outcome of an election with only 0,0321% of the total votes cast. In fact at the time of the first network prediction of a Romney win 0% of votes had been counted. Statistical information for predictions are based on information provided to all news networks by Edison Research. In Iowa 8 precincts were never counted, remarkably all of them were major Ron Paul strongholds. Edison Research provided research for exit polling, and turned the information over to a totally new organization, Voters News Service who is affiliated with Edison Research and works in collusion with AP (Associated Press), which is the news-provider to all the networks. Prior to issuing the bogus results, all vote counting was moved to a secret and undisclosed location. In New Hampshire where no voter ID’s are required, follow up investigations have proven that over 900 dead people voted for Romney. In Maine the counties containing universities that have the largest Ron Paul support were all omitted from the total count. Reasonable information seems to indicate that Ron Paul won at least three states in which the RNC and media rigged counts. The only conclusion possible from this information being that the networks knew in advance who was chosen to win individual primaries and were provided that information by the RNC through surrogate contractors of the RNC. And America is sending her young military people out into the world to get killed teaching the world about democracy!

Purchase:

“Our Vision for America”
ISBN 978-1-937553-05-0 from:
www.A2Zpublications,com
www.American3rdPostion.com
http://merlinmiller2012.com
Amazon, Alibris, Books a million, Barns & Noble and all book sellers.


Whores, Pimps and Enablers!

Dr. A. H. Krieg | With such a proactive title I suspect the reader will want an explanation, something I could hardly disagree with. I am of course not speaking of the world’s oldest profession; rather I speak of our present Republocrat political malaise centered in Disney World on the Potomac. So let me begin by outlining who the Whores are and why they are Whores, I do apologize to all ladies of the night who at least provide a service to their customers. The Whores are the politicians, who are Whores because they are indebted to their providers the Pimps that provide the lubricant mammon that allows the Whores to remain at the trough of perpetual re-elections paid for by the Enablers that are the source of all those funds. So gratuitous are these efforts that the Whores have achieved a re-election rate of 87% as of 2011.

Whores, Pimps and EnablersPerhaps I am somewhat too cryptic. The Pimps are the middlemen — those 15,000 or so lobbyists plying their Payola trade in and about the capitol and “Black House”. Come on now, I am only making an attempt, even if somewhat sarcastic, to be PC. These Pimps also convey to the Whores all legislative proposals, new bills, and demanded paybacks to the Enablers. Things like government contracts, positions in the administration, bureaucratic appointments and such. Every once in a while the Whores are then allowed to attach a rider to one of the legislative boondoggles benefiting their districts, thereby ingratiating themselves to the Fools. I forgot about the Fools, they are the citizens that keep electing the same bunch of Republocrat crooks whose only real skill appears to be fleecing the Fools.

The Enablers, well if you really think about them its in truth easy to identify them, after all how many people have the ability to give away millions upon millions of dollars to the Pimps for properly administered Payola. First off, an Enabler must in his business have extraordinary profits, well not in all cases, but in most. Trial lawyers, Pharmaceuticals, and of course the greatest “Ponzigonifs” of all, the “Banksters”. We should not forget all those wonderful companies bailed out by “Uncle”, you know Government Motors, AIG, Solyndra, and Chrysler and such that contributed well over $20 million to the Whores after they were bailed out. If they used bailout funds of others has not to date been postulated.

There is another sort of Enabler a very bad sort. These are organizations that operate as “bundlers” for social, religious, and politically motivated groups of people. Outfits like AIPAC whose mostly dual national membership funnels foreign aid back to America as campaign contributions for candidates of their persuasion. Others like SPLC have a more sinister purpose, which is to denigrate with false propaganda anyone opposed to their plans. Outfits like SPLC couldn’t even qualify as Whores it would be an insult to a profession that provides a service. When it reaches the point that is already upon us, where Uncle becomes a major business partner with organizations like SPLC by providing them contracts, it gets downright odious. An interesting side-note to this is that an examination of SPLC Internet sites lists lots of so called “Hate Groups” most of which have been imagined, invented, or more often falsely accused by SPLC to further their objective of getting more government contracts exposing invented hate groups. Some of the so-called hate groups by SPLC have one or two members.

Think about these things before you again step into a voting booth.

Dr. Adrian KriegDr. Krieg is on the board of directors of A3P American Third Position Party. Adrian Krieg was born in St. Gallen Switzerland. He attended HS Pembroke Academy (Suncook NH) class valedictorian. He also attended Elmhurst College, University of Mexico (San Miguel De Allende campus). Dr. Krieg is a certified Manufacturing Engineer. (CMFGE) U.S. Army Message center, Bi-lingual communications, served with nuclear artillery in Germany top-secret clearance. World University Cultural doctorate in Manufacturing Science. Dr. Krieg holds many U.S. Patents. Presently he is Co-Chair Political Science Department World University Roundtable.


Class Warfare

Dr. A. H. Krieg | “What I did that was new was to prove that the class struggle necessarily leads to the dictatorship of the proletariat!”
-Nope, it was not Obama. It was Karl Marx!

Progressives and Obama in particular have revived the old European communist class warfare of the 1920’s and ‘30’s to the extent that you become confused what century we are in. You know all that stuff about the evil rich, I mean of course, your employer, you know the guy who pays your salary, well that’s if you have a job. The person investing in R&D, who pays half of your Social Security. Well. Let’s not go on and just get to the point.

Obama has made it plain as the nose on your face that people who earn over $200,000 or couples who earn over $ 250,000 are evil leeches and do not deserve to keep the money for which they worked and should be penalized by massive tax increases just because they are “the wealthy” or “the rich” who must, in the age of Obama, be penalized so that society can be made equal. The fact that these people worked hard for this income seems inconsequential to an administration staffed by lay-abouts who have never in their joint lives worked in a for profit enterprise or been in the military. Unfortunately Obama is right in that class his income is over one million, I’m sure he thinks all those people’s wives also went on vacation to Spain for a cost of over two million dollars. He probably thinks that everyone else, (but excluding Nancy) including all Senators have taken six vacations in the last 18 months. Not really ever having been gainfully employed anyplace you can quickly understand he mind set.

Enough said, what he has alleged is that he does not want the rich to benefit from tax cuts that he thinks others are entitled to. In a word, class-war. The communist nature of his dictum is clear when you read the second article of Manifest der Kommunistischer Partei of 1848 by Karl Marx; which states, a heavy progressive or graduating income tax. Well, why not, after all Wilson whose administration passed the 16th amendment in 1913 was an academic progressive socialist. We find it interesting that people enjoyed in academia, government, and foundations are the great proponents of socialism, those who work for a living know better.

Let’s assume that we can get some reasonable statistics from non-governmental organizations on the Internet, you know the very wellspring of information that our Israeli Senator Lieberman, the guy who thinks he’s in the Knesset not the U. S. Senate wants regulated [i.e. censored] by the FCC. Have you ever considerd that progressives attack their opponents in only two ways, they a) call them names, or b) lie about them and what they say, truth simply obliterates their arguments so a) & b) is all that they are left with.

Statistically, the in Obama’s terms, rich, have declined in number because many are departing the United States for nations offering a libertarian view on economics that is private sector friendly. So from 3 million rich in 2007 we now have 2.5 million of them in America. Just, and by the way, the “Trojan Horse” of “Free Trade” that is responsible for the departure of over 5,000 manufacturing plants to Mexico and the third world has absolutely nothing to do with this issue, and neither does the fact that NAFTA, in a short ten years, turned a $5.7 billion annual trade surplus with Mexico into a $ 64.7 billion annual deficit has nothing to do with it either. The sheer genius of our Yiddish (CEA) Council of Economic Advisors) sometimes simply astounds me. Oh, just to clarify 2.5 million of America’s population is about 0.008 percent, for bureaucrats at the CEA that’s less than one percent.

Just exactly how these remaining 2.5 million mostly private sector employers are going to increase their payrolls, i.e. hire more of us, spend more money on R&D i.e. manufacturing new products, and expand their businesses when their taxes are increased and they have to carry huge healthcare cost increases, is anyone’s guess, but for those in DC, frankly it anin’t gona happen!

Statistically the total annual income is less than seven percent of these peoples total asset wealth. So, think about it, what percentage of your total income is reflected in your asset wealth? My guess is that it’s closer to 20% than 7 %. About half of these “filthy rich” have homes in which they have lived for over 20 years. Over 80% are self employed and earned their wealth. Most live below their means and save about 15% of their annual income, and almost all of the drive older cars. On average they work over 50 hours a week, and only 20% are college graduates. They are very careful about their investment but invest about 20% of their gross income.

Just so you know, half of Americans pay no income tax at all because their earnings are below the IRS threshold. But our president does not fit into any of this mould; he made his money by having some books ghost written for him, and living high on the hog on you. Well, that’s nothing new either think of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Bill Bennett, and an entire raft of politicos that collected publishers’ payola from ghostwriters’ efforts. Hey, I know I have ghost written many.

However you think of this topic, regardless of your political affiliations, economic outlook, or whatever, no one but a total fool would raise taxes on the very people who are in position to take our nation out of this depression. In fact if we return to the depression of 1920 Warren G. Harding is the man who got it all right. First he cut all taxes by half, then he cut all government spending by half, and finally he cut government bureaucrats by half. Low-and-behold within less than 12 months the roaring 20’s commenced with less than 4% unemployment.
Obama and his ill-informed advisors however, are following FDR’s example that succeeded in extending the ‘Great Depression from 1939 to 1945, it took a World War, then engineered by FDR to get us out of it, and end it. It could not possibly be that our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have anything at all to do with these Obama/Bush policies? No.

From day one of the 2008 depression beginning under Bush, and then accelerating to process under Obama, everything that can and could be done wrong was done wrong. Instead of cutting costs, curtailing the bureaucracy, cutting regulations and reducing taxes, they have increased taxes, increased the size of government, increased spending, purchased failing corporations, expanded the bureaucracy, increased regulations, and to boot are in the process of nationalizing 17% of the economy though Obamacare, and then burdened the economy with draconian control of the finacial and lending industries through gross over-regulation with a over 2,000 page bill.

And now I must tell you that all these things were done to benefit you. These matters will interst you even if you still have a job. These benefits include, higher unemployment 22.5%, massive inflation 10.3%, dollar devaluation to the tune of 20%, a falling gross national product, increasing trade deficits, reduced domestic manufacturing, increasing taxes, rinsing prices especially in healthcare insurance, dropping real-estate values, massive foreclosures, I won’t go on it’s far too depressing.

Paul Klugman take note!

Dysfunctional Disorganized American Foreign Policy

Dr. Adrian H. Krieg | While the multitudes remain ignorant of our foreign political dilemma, Obama seeks their vote; all the while computer programs and ballot access had already achieved the elite’s desired election outcome having already determined the end result, as if the 2008 election result would have any effect on foreign policy which has been controlled by AIPAC, the CFR and TC for the last five decades.

Global Strategy

The players:
America’s national political dilemma is that American foreign policy is based upon working groups within the CFR (1), and a state department that lacks vision, and planning. They together with AIPAC control all American foreign Policy. Surely we can add TC (2) to this kettle as they also produce some policy documents. Another source of influence is the European Bilderberger Group (3) whose American impact is primarily indirect. While America has numerous other secretive organizations such as Bohemian Grove, Bones, (The Order) and the radical feminist Belizean Grove that even have members in the Supreme Court. and others, the primary inputs in determining American foreign policy is the CFR. Their quarterly publication titled Foreign Affairs is the primary organ of announcing their and thus America’s general foreign policy plans. The lack of planning within government is the social and political isolation of most Americans, the lack of a classic foreign service, and a political system consisting of primarily one party whose reelection rate exceeds 87%. The political system, which after all is said and done, does excerpt some influence on American external policy, is mired in a two party political structure whose two sides has the same basic policies. Into this mix comes AIPAC (4) whose massive political spending distorts American policy, particularly in the Middle East. Since the Middle East is the 21st century’s primary foreign problem it behooves us to consider the impact of these groups upon policy. Much of AIPAC’s funding of candidates most likely comes in the form of returned American foreign aid used to purchase congress.

Tweedledee & TweedledumThe CFR has about 3,400 members. The leadership has in the passed as well as the present been heavily influenced by Bonesmen (members of the Order) a Yale University based senior society that has since it’s founding in the 1830’s excreted undue influence on the American political and jurisprudent scene. Leadership of the CFR has been in the hands of Bonesmen since it’s foundation in the 1920’s. It is important to understand that Bones through leadership positions within scores of secret and semi-secret organizations including the Episcopalian Church wherein they hold many bishop positions, as well as banks and the media, set the agenda as well as the dialogue and thus are able to control the outcome.

To clarify this we take the example of William Buckley who recently past away. He was touted to be a great conservative; he was not. Buckley’s National Review was funded by the CIA (7) for years; he was a Bonesman, CFR member, and TC member, belonged to the Bilderbergers and frequently participated in the Bohemian grove debauch. Things are not always what we think them to be certainly not when the media reports them.

The Trilateral Commission was the brainchild of Zbigniew Brzezinski, which he proposed to David Rockefeller who was at the time chairman of the CFR at a meeting in Rockefellers Westchester estate. The idea was that there should be an organization with membership from Asia, Europe as well as America, thus Trilateral.

The Bilderbergers were established at the hotel de Bilderberger in the Dutch town of Oosterbeek in May of 1954. Price Bernard of Holland who had been involved with the Nazi SS during WWII (upstanding member of the SS) is credited as the principal organizer. The Bilderbergers are credited with the Treaty of Rome that went on to institute the present EU.

AIPAC is the most powerful lobby in America far outpacing the NRA (5) due to their massive purse, and thousands of helpers. AIPAC is in accordance with American law illegal. (6)

There can be no question but that there is a marionette master behind the scenes manipulating all the strings in unison. The relationship between the zionists, Communists, Illuminati and Bones has been well established for many decades.(8)

We see from the aforementioned paragraphs that there are a small number of organizations, both secretive as well as secret with a total membership of fewer than 8,000. who participate in the development of American foreign policy. Of these the leadership is less than 100 and they control the discourse and implementation of foreign policy and have total control of the lamestream media.

Beginning to about 1985 a new group came to the forefront being pushed into their new leadership position by AIPAC. This new group called themselves the Neo-Cons. (New Conservatives) like everything else in this tale that title is a lie they are not new conservatives they are socialist zionist agitators. The parents of these people were to a man the Tokyoites of the 20’s who mostly resided in NYC on Rivington Street in lower Manhattan. With publications like Projects for a New American Century (9) and others many funded by the Israeli government and zionist think tanks we can surmise that American foreign policy beginning in the first Geroge W. Bush administration began being formulated in Jerusalem and by the Neo-Cons for he benefit of the Greater Israel concept (10) rather than the benefit of America.

How much foreign aid provided to Israel is returned to America in the form of political contributions to political campaigns is not know. It is however a reasonable assumption that a large portion of American foreign aid is channeled back to American politicians thorough individual as well as third party contributions. Large amounts of political contributions do not have to be reported if to a political party, or if they are small, and many others are put down as unknown origin contributions. In the 2008 campaign over 40% of the contributions origins remain undeclared. The use by Israelis, of using un-named credit cards as a means of making anonymous contributions to political campaigns began in the 80’s.

Associations:
In order to understand formulation of American foreign policy it is necessary to gain insight into the many associations between the various organizations above mentioned. Often these links are tenuous to establish because the day-today operations of the organizations remains clouded in secrecy. There is however one means of testing relationships that are very difficult to hide. Only the Bilderbergers whose membership roster remains unpublished and many of whose members attend meetings incognito partially defy this effort. By examining the leadership of the separate organizations and then matching them with the others one can develop a list of sorts of the master puppeteers. We call these people the super mandarins. In my book The Satori and the New Mandarins (11) I listed Paul Arthur Allaire (Chairman Xerox) Graham Tillett Allison Jr. (CFR) Dwayne Orville Andreas (CEO ADM) Zbigniew Brzezinski (Center for Strategic & International Studies) William Jefferson Clinton (at that time US president) among 24 others. The repeated underlying principle of this research indicates that a preponderance of the leadership within these organizations point to a commonality of membership in Illuminist organizations like Bones, or being a Rhodes scholarship (socialist indoctrination) member. The fact that both presidential aspirants in 2004 were Bonesmen did not escape most people’s attention, and neither did Clinton’s Rhodes association. And the fact that in 2008 similar relationships with aforementioned organizations exists with all the Republocrat candidates is also a known commodity; things this time around are hardly different.

It would appear by these facts that there are differing philosophic assumptions at work here. This however is not the case. The relationship between zionism, illumonism and communism is so closely interrelated as to make them appear identical. The communist theory that was plagiarized by Karl Marx in 1848 through his publication of Manifest der Kommunistischer Partei in London England published by Burghart was a copy of a document produced by Adam Weisshaupt the Bavarian founder of the Illuminist movement in 1787. The relationship between zionism and communism is proven by the fact that every communist party in the world from 1900 to 1980 was run by a Jew. Furthermore the entire Central Committee, quasi cabinet, and the Supreme Soviet were to a man Jews, with three exceptions of three men who were married to Jewish women.(12) The CP leaderships in Germany, Austria, France, Hungary, Romania, and all of Eastern Europe were all Ashkenazi.

Global Policy;
Any reasonable government trains and nurtures a select staff of diplomats that are conversant with the languages and customs of their intended postings so as to facilitate reasonable discourse, avoid misunderstanding, and nurture good relationships with the governments of these nations and improve trade. In America most Ambassadors are appointed based on their finacial contributions to the party in power. Not only is this stupid it often results in direct insults to nations with which we desire to have political, social and economic intercourse. Some of the dumbest efforts have been the appointment of an openly homosexual ambassador to Belgium, a secretary of state visiting the Middle East in a pantsuit, the appointment of a female ambassador to Italy. I would call this in-your-face stupidity. Poking people in the eye does not lend itself to good relations.

I have met scores of diplomats and only American diplomats are single language ones. Almost all diplomats of civilized nations speak English, French and at least one other language. When I was in the military I was responsible to organize several social functions for the 7th army. On one occasion an American General (13) insisted on serving coca cola with dinner, it took me two hours to convince him that this would be a major social blunder that is exactly the type of people that the State Department sends overseas.

It is a reasonable assumption that a national external policy be so constructed as to benefit those nations political, economic and social aspirations. American foreign policy can be seen to contradict that assumption, and in fact be so construed as to benefit not American external policy but Israeli external policy. This assumption can be concluded from a large number of documented polices of the U.S. State Department. Such polices would include, but not be restricted to, providing Israel one of the highest per capita wealthiest nation in the world with the largest amount of foreign aid, and providing Israel billions of dollars of military aid that is used almost exclusively in preemptive wars of aggression against its neighboring states as well as the illegal (14) occupation on the West Bank and Gaza that have a population of over three million. The wars against Iraq that were totally based on lies provided by the Mossad(15) in one case through the Italian and then British secret services. (16)

Foreign policy is also the result of domestic actions. The World Trade Center incidents that in the first bombing and then the air attacks on 9-11 have the smell of false flag operations. The 9-11 commission report is widely, by over half the population believed to be a repeat of the Kennedy assassination cover up, while the Pentagon and Pennsylvania occurrences are assumed to be total falsifications of what took place by over three fourths of the American people’s. 9-11 has lead to drastic changes in American civil liberties resulting in more aggressive foreign policy, preemptive wars and general population loss of civil rights. (17) The Patriot Act was instituted within days of the 9-11 tragedy, it had in fact been written over 12 months prior to the occurrence of 9-11. At the time of the Patriot Acts first airing several congressmen stated, “you won’t get that passed unless there is a huge national emergency”, it was provided!

An analysis of American foreign policy during the W. Bush administration leads to several conclusions.

  1. American 21st century foreign policy does not benefit America.
  2. American 21st century foreign policy is the product of zionists whose intent it is to benefit Israeli expansionist policies.
  3. America’s foreign policy is at least partially responsible for America’s finacial collapse.
  4. Internal as well as external American policy is purposely designed to attain goals benefiting Israel at the detriment of America.
  5. Zionists who ardently support these policies control the American mass media.

Absolutely nothing has changed in the Obama administration. In conclusion of these facts we can surmise that Jews including 30 congressmen and 15 senators, in America place Israel and Israeli policies before those of their homeland.

Results:

Our present 21st century foreign policy has been a disaster for our country. Take just one issue, the war against Iraq. By the end of 2011 this war will have cost our nation over three trillion dollars that we can’t afford. The war was based on lies from day one, through the desire of the Bush – Cheney gang to gain control of the world’s second largest oilfields and Israel’s expansionist plans of “Greater Israel”. There were no weapons of mass destruction, no nuclear facilities, no ICBM’s no CBM’s, no chemical or bacteriological weapons, and no Yellow Cake importation. Bush, Cheney, and Powel lied to the UN, Congress the American people and the world. The recurring nightmare of Americans is why none of these liars are in jail?

One of the premises of our pro Israeli foreign policy is that according to the zionist media Israel is a democracy and America’s greatest ally in the Middle East. It should firstly be pointed out that prior to 1948 and the foundation of Israel by the Balfour declaration (18) we had no enemies in the Middle East. The Balfour Declaration took place just months after 1st Viscount. Lord Marshall Allenby had already given the same lands to the Palestinians in perpetuity for their aid in defeating the WW1 Ottoman Turks who were allied with the Germans. It is also to be understood that Israel is a socialist theocracy that has no standing as a pluralistic democracy or a republic. Israeli laws are so racist that they could no even pass muster in third world nations.

Israel has a population of about 7 million of which a minority are non-Jews, primarily Muslims and Christians who are second class citizens. Islam on the other hand has a population of over 1.5 billion separated into scores of nations. Just based on those terms it would make sense to at minimum have an even-handed foreign policy for the Middle East.

The latest in a long list of Israeli plans is war against Iran. The American zionists, AIPAC, and all the usual suspects have been beating the drums of war for the last twelve months. The American zionist controlled media has been backing these plans, as has our State Department. Media people like Glen Beck, Hannity; O’Reiley, Congresswoman Bachman, and Palin relentlessly pound on those same war drums. The concept of a war against Iran reflects a total lack of understanding of geo-politics, geography, population, and history. Iran has not even proposed any external military ambitions in the last 500 years. Iran is three times the size of Iraq, has a population of over 75 million, is mountainous, borders the Gulf of Oman, The Persian Gulf, The Caspian sea, Iraq, Turkey, Russia, Afghanistan, Georgia, and Pakistan. A war with Iran would under any circumstances spill over into neighboring nations, especially Iraq and Syria both of which have large Islamist populations, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Georgia, many of which Israel has illegally attacked several times already or secretly supported rebellion and wars within those nations.

Mad dog Cheney has suggested nuclear strikes against Iran, which would most certainly result in radiation problems from the outcome into Western Europe. Not one single source has confirmed or even suggested that Iran is in developmental stage of producing nuclear weapons, all we have heard is saber rattling from Israel, and Washington. Just as Iraq before this occurrence no hard evidence has been produced, and the UN atomic energy agency CIA and NSA as well as the Pentagon has repeatedly stated that no evidence exists, that Iran is perusing a weapons program. In order to achieve the Zionist goal of “Greater Israel” they want Iran destabilized just as they have done to Lebanon, and are doing to Syria, and Jordan. The most recent Israeli attack on Syria, where they claimed to have destroyed a nuclear facility is another lie. This would be the first nuclear facility with, no security, not even a fence, no water supply, no cooling tower, and no containment vessel, housed in a three story commercial building in the middle of a desert. Preposterous!

The endemic question is how did we get to this point? The retort is simple we replaced patriots in the service of America with academicians and college boys that have lost any understanding of what America is about. They have bought into the UN ambassadorial concept of placing groups and nations before individuals. The do not think that American commercial and economic prowess has any place in foreign policy, evidenced that they most frequently hide their embassy spies under the classification of commercial attaché’ they believe in governments Israel and ours, not in people. They believe that the voluntary actions of the population should be impeded and governed by governments. They believe that governments and bankers should value fiat species, whose value they can inflate and deflate at will. They above all, believe that government exists to redistribute wealth from those who work hard to those who don’t, and that includes foreign aid. They do not believe in individual liberty but in government coercion of its citizens. And lastly they do not believe that people are responsible for their own actions but that groups are the guiding principle of government largess. In other words they believe Adam Weishaupt’s theorem that was plagiarized by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.

**Note: I never capitalize zionist; it is not a religion, not a nationality and not a racial grouping.

    (1) CFR Counsel on Foreign Relations Pratt House 68th St NYC (About 3.400 members)
    (2) TC Trilateral Commission 1156 15th St. N.W. Washington DC (about 340 members)
    (3) The Bilderbergers are extremely secretive and no domicile is listed. (Membership is assumed to be close to 600)
    (4) AIPAC American Israeli Public Affairs Committee
    (5) NRA National Rifle Association about 3 million members.
    (6) The Foreign Registration Act requires foreign lobbies to register, which AIPAC refuses to do, and the Justice Department is afraid to enforce.
    (7) The CIA Central Intelligence Agency ran operation Mockingbird that was exposed in 1975 by the Church Commission as a domestic propaganda effort. Note also E. Howard Hunts book Memoirs of an American Spy. The branch that is responsible for domestic propaganda is the OPC Office of Policy Coordination.
    (8) The Illuminati and its Plans for the Future A. H. Krieg ISBN 0-9748502-3-3 pp 19-43
    (9) PNAC chairman is William Kristol one of the Neo-Con Leaders.
    (10) Greater Israel is the zionist claim that Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The Sinai of Egypt, Gaza, The West Bank and Iraq to the Tigris River and north to the Turkish border were give to the Jews by their God.
    (11) The Satori and the New Mandarins ISBN 0-87319-044-0 published by Hallberg 1998 pp 233 –234 list. Now out of print (used copies on Amazon)
    (12) Vale The Illuminati and its plans for the future ISBN 0-9748503-3-3 by A. H. Krieg PP 28, – 32 New American Newspeak Dictionary 0-9748502-4-1 by A. H. Krieg (Central Committee) pp 23 (Communist leadership) pp 26
    (13) General Unger Div Arty 3rd Inf. Div 7th Army US army Germany 1959
    (14) Scores of UN Resolutions
    (15) The Mossad is Israels external spy agency.
    (16) The Yellow Cake from Niger assertion
    (17) Actions after 9-11 resulted in the Patriot Act, which violates the first fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eight, and tenth part of the Bill of rights and the suspension of Habeas Corpus.
    (18) The Balfour Declaration was made by Lord Balfour to the then sitting chairman of the world Zionist Federation Lord Rothschild


Energy & Food Crisis: Made in Washington

Dr. A. H. Krieg | “The most common lies are those by which politicians deceive the public; other dishonesty of the public is rare.”

Energy and FoodLet us outline some observations. 1. There is no energy crisis. 2. Global warming (cooling) is the product of the sun and not of man. 3. Most of our present problems are attributable to the environmental movement. 4. Ethanol as a fuel for vehicles is stupid. 5. If we should ever run out of oil we have enough anthracite coal for the next six centuries. 6. North America has the largest oil & natural gas reserve deposits in the world. 7. The wars and all the afore listed problems are interrelated and have nothing to do with energy or food and everything to do with political control and power. 8. Food price increases are in large part due to the production of ethanol.

Let us clarify that last sentence. It is our opinion as well as those of many scientists, geologists, climateologists and engineers that all of the presently touted energy related problems are a fabrication of the “Republocrat System”, for the sole purpose of achieving control of society. Those in the environmental movement are the dupes of these elitists and unknowingly carry out their agenda. We do not make this claim lightly and will in due course provide ample evidence of this position.

1) There is no energy crisis, it is a fabrication produced in the political capitols of the world and its main sources are Washington and Brussels. The principal protagonists of this fiction are the well meaning but un-informed members of the environmental movement and the political party known as the Republocrats and Eurocrarts, and politicians who either curry votes of the greens or pander to them, and politicians that are members of the elites. Shocking as this statement is, it is our opinion and is correct.

A primary premise of the supporters of the cause of energy related problems is that energy in the form of fossil fuels is a finite commodity and that we are on the verge of running out of oil, coal and natural gas. (Fossil fuels). First and foremost the reader must understand that oil and natural gas are only a part of the fossil fuels with which God has endowed our planet. The by far larger deposits of fossil fuel is coal and of coal the most useful is anthracite, coal that can be liquefied to produce natural gas as well as all petroleum based products we presently produce from oil. The technology to do this is about 90 years old having been developed by the Germans in the 1920’s. Sasol is a South African company traded on the NY stock exchange that operates a substantial number of coal liquidation plants in South Africa. Please do Goggle Sasol. While America has the world’s largest proven reserves of anthracite, (over 600 years at present consumption rate), South Africa has the second largest deposits. Coal liquidation is much less expensive than purchasing oil from OPEC nations.

Overall oil and natural gas deposits in the Beaufort Sea principally in the region of Gull Island and extending about 40 miles from it on what is commonly called the Alaskan North Slope combined with the Kuparuck fields covering an area of about 30 x 60 square miles is larger than the combined oil reserves of Iraq and Saudi Arabia combined. Gull Island that is located about 5 nautical miles from Prudhoe Bay could produce so much oil that the Alaska pipeline would have to be expanded five fold. Wellhead pressure on the surface is 90 pounds; the oil does not even have to be pumped. The same holds true for the Kuparuck field.

The Gull island fields have not produced one single dry well in an arc stretching 40 miles out from the island. All the chemistry is identical so it is one single pool of oil under 90 pounds per square inch of pressure extending 40 miles out into the Beaufort Sea. Just one capped well came in at 30,000 barrels per day through a 3 ½” pipe. For size the operating Prudhoe Bay field is presently pumping two million barrels a day Gull island could dwarf that and potential output and the Kuparuck field is fifty times larger. What is even more interesting is that the sulfur content of this oil is very low a chemical analysis indicate 0.90% Sulfur, wax content 6% Asphalt content 2% pour point –15 deg. F.

The Bakken field is the largest domestic oil discovery since Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay, it is estimated at 503 billion barrels. (U.S. Geological Survey report) The technical name is the Williston Basin and it stretches from Northern Montana through North Dakota and into Canada. Furthermore it is what is technically called light sweet oil, whose production cost is only $16. per barrel. That by itself is sufficient oil for American consumption through 2041 if production had begun in 2006. Placing this into perspective just this field has eight times more than Saudi Arabia, 18 times more that Iraq, and 21 times more than Kuwait.

To place this into historic perspective we need to go back to the 1973 oil embargo and the consequential energy shortages that ensued during the Tricky Dick Nixon administration. The fact is, that historically the entire episode was man made and Nixon was right in the middle of it all. As the shortage expanded Maine governor Kenneth M. Curtis accused Nixon of purposely fabricating the shortages. Then in the same year the Philadelphia Inquirer in a lengthy article proved that Exxon, Mobile, Texaco, Gulf, and Standard oil of California were exporting two barrels of oil at higher price for every one they sold domestically. Lloyds of London is a principal insurer of tankers. According to their records the number of tankers departing the Middle East for Europe (1973) and America was slightly larger during the shortage than four months before. The rise in tanker departures rose from 474 to 492.

In 1977 the total North American oil reserve deposits in ground were expanded by about 88% and roughly three quarters of these were drilled, however those in North America have in large part been capped because they are owned by one of the previously named “Seven Sisters” which earns greater profit on imported crude and refined product than that on that produced in America. Then in ‘77 Carter created the Department of Energy enacted in 1980. (Just as the shortages became pronounced) DOE has had some successes as they expanded the energy shortage and lengthened it in duration, and then they created the draconian nuclear energy fiasco that dismantled our only nuclear fuel reprocessing plant, that Carter shut down, selling it in parts to BNFL in the UK and made the construction of nuclear electric generating plants impossible because of costs related to by over-regulation. Since the creation of the Department of Energy (1980) American oil production has fallen from about 27% of domestic consumption to about 14%. When Carter established the DOE he stated that he DOE would reverse the trend of imported oil and make America energy independent. It is doing the exact opposite!

Reliable but unnamed sources (from ARCO) in 1975 as reported by former Secretary of Sate of Colorado Hough Chase claimed that the government allowed only one field out of three to be drilled in Alaska and that there was sufficient supply in the Beaufort Sea to meet America’s oil needs for the next 200 years, without pumping, because in ground pressure was sufficient to meet the output. Furthermore according to this source market expansion was figured in. Drilled wells in all three fields indicate three separate deposits confirmed by differing chemical analysis of all wells drilled in each of the fields. All wells, (about 40 of them) were required to be capped by the government. The North Slope oil fields consist of an area of over 50,000 Square miles. ARCO, Chaplin, Lindsey Williams made a second corroboration of this when he stated,” There will never be an energy crisis because we have as much oil as does Saudi Arabia.” Williams was Chaplin for the thousands of pipeline workers and roughnecks who were employed in Alaska during the exploration and pipeline construction.

Shortly after discovery of these oil deposits the government ordered all geological reports locked up and all wells capped on Gull Island and its surrounding fields as well as the thirty by sixty mile Kuparuck field. The reported reason by Washington was that environmentalist claimed that any possible spill would cause an environmental catastrophe. This is akin to not scrambling eggs because you might miss the bowl with the yoke after you broke the shell.

The Hudson Institute (look up on internet) stated in 1977 that Carter was wrong in saying” we stand no chance of becoming energy independent”. Available information on energy based on scientifically peer-reviewed information reveals the following (this was in ’77) Continental (48 state) in ground deposits 150 billion barrels, the ’77 API report stated an estimated 303.5 billion barrels, “68 Geological survey Atlantic ocean continental shelf 224 billion barrels, Pacific coast 275 billion barrels, Alaska 502 billion barrels, for a total of 1,576 billion barrels in ground. And all this was before the Bakken discovery. The government in its infinite wisdom has seen to it that only 2% of the proven reserves have been licensed. These deposits are enough oil at present national growth rate (19 million barrel a day consumption USA) to see to our total needs for the next 200 years, In a 1972 report the Wall Street Journal stated that we have enough natural gas deposits for the next 1,000 years. Total in ground deposits in the Continental (lower 48 states) and continental shelves are estimated at 758 trillion cubic feet. This does not include Alaska. In a book of the Hudson Institute by Herman Kahn we learn that of the fossil fuels (oil, coal, natural gas, coal shale, and tar sand) we could easily supply the entire world with fossil fuels for the next several hundred years.

The once seven sisters are now consolidated into the five sisters, which are Exxon, Chevron-Texaco, BP, Shell and Conoco-Philips. Just imagine how simple it is for a consortium of five companies in collusion with the government to control all of our energy needs. Bear in mind that these companies also control the mining of most uranium, coal, oil as well as natural gas. Remember that the government either controls all known deposits of any size while the sisters have the rest locked up for the next 100-years in land mineral leases. These companies have two policies, 1) optimize profit in the short term, and 2) optimize in ground deposits for maximum long gevity and profit. It goes without saying that all steps are taken to ensure fossil fuel dependence permanently. And just to ensure that they have also locked up North American uranium, and all coal deposits.

American oil
Field Average depth Size
Prudhoe 600 ft 100 Sq. Mi.
Kuparuck 300 ft 200 Sq. Mi
Gull Island 1200 ft very large total size unknown
Bakken 2000 ft 800 +Sq. Mi.

All three leading presidential candidates for 2012 have incoherent energy policies none of the 2012 candidates of either party have articulated any energy policies and are unaware of the realities existing in this sector of the economy. The Obama administration into its last year has not produced any viable energy policy at all except to provide Brazil’s Petrobras two billion credit for deep-water oil production off the Brazilian coast and shutting down America’s Gulf deep-water production and financing Columbian oil refining plants.

At least to McCain’s credit he had proposes an expansion of nuclear generation. Obama on the other hand comes up with silly environmental wind generation and solar electric algae fuel production that could not under any circumstances produce more than 10% of our energy needs within the next 20 years. Such PC crap and that is exactly what it is, wastes our time and resources.

2) The world’s major problems are attributable to false environmental actions taken by society due to misinformation published by environmental organizations and the propagation of this misinformation by the media and energy producers that gain profit through it. These include among others that, global warming is due to man, (Climate change?) Freon caused the Ozone hole, CO2 is harmful to the planet, Cutting fire breaks is somehow harmful to animals, pipelines impede migratory species, nuclear energy production is dangerous, governments should be the stewards of land, and burning wood is better than splitting atoms. (Clamshell Alliance)

In December of 2007 over 100 world scientists sent a poignant letter to the Secretary of the UN Mr. Ban Ki-Moon. I want to emphasize that these were not the frequently by the media quoted members of the Union of Concerned Scientists that require such stringent qualifications for association that several dogs and cats have attained membership. No, these are real professors, PhD’s, lecturers and doctors. Among the writers were; Dr. Antonio Zichichi President of the World Federation of Scientists, Dr. Reid Byson the father of modern meteorology, Dr. Syun-Ichi Akasofu of the international Arctic Research Center, twice named one of the worlds most cited scientists, Dr. Richard Lindzen UN IPCC scientist, among others. The most remarkable thing about the list is that it contains almost no Americans; most of our so-called scientists are cowards in opposing the PC political/environmental movement.

The letter in stark terms warns against the existing “movement of “futile” climate control efforts”. Among other things it clearly states “ Significant new peer-reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human caused global warming”. The fact of the matter is that today most atmospheric scientists, geologists, and climateologists agree that man’s input or ability to alter global climatic conditions are limited to the point of being useless.

The IPCC is the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; it is the major producer of data relating to climate. Unfortunately their reports circulate among politicians and non-scientists who frequently draw incorrect conclusions about the issue. Furthermore these reports are prepared by a small number of politically active core writers who are subject to tremendous pressure from PC academia as well as environmental activists. Their conclusions are for the most part outcome based driven and never peer reviewed thereby making them worthless. The vast majority of thousands of qualified scientists, climateologists, geologists, and atmospheric specialist are never consulted about the conclusions reached by the IPCC. Summaries of issues presented by the IPCC do not therefore represent any consensus view of scientists in fields related to global warming. The IPCC is a politically motivated organization whose conclusions can be proven wrong with ease.

When former VP Ozone (I invented the Internet) Al Gore whose academic record is not particularly impressive and whose environmental credentials are most suspect when his lifestyle and personal energy consumption record is accessed, and then makes wild statements, which are unproven and in many cases totally wrong becomes the spokesperson for a cause, we become wary. Our disdain for Gore goes all the way back to his ghost written book Earth in the Balance, which had over 50 scientific errors in the first twenty pages. Michael More the progressive socialist Democrat from the left coast who is the darling of the environmentalist movement can realistically be classified as uneducated lout.

From the letter to the UN Secretary General;

*Recent observations of phenomenon such as glacial retreats, seal-level rise and the migration of temperature-sensitive species are not evidence for abnormal climate change, for none of these changes has been shown to lie outside the bounds of known natural variability.

*The average rate of warming of 0.1 to 0.2 degrees Celsius per decade recorded by satellites during the late 20th century falls within known natural rates of warming and cooling over the last 10,000 years.

*Leading scientists, including some senior IPCC representatives, acknowledge that today’s computer models cannot predict climate. Consistent with this, and despite computer projections of temperature rises, there has been no net global warming since 1998. That current temperature plateau follows a late 20th-century period of warming is consistent with the continuation today of natural multi-decade or millennial climate cycling.

The entire environmental movement is strongly connected with socialist political elements that have outcome based plans and are utilizing this issue as a vehicle to achieve their desired socialist goals. The fact that the political left i.e. the socialists is the closest ally of the environmental movement is a proven fact. In Germany per example where this issue has gained primary national prominence the Greens (Die Gruenen) and the gays (Die Bunten) Buentniss 90 (The old Communist Green party of the DDR) and the German Socialists formed a union and controlled the government for over a decade. The basic goal of the socialists is to gain political power over property and land, by being elected to govern, the basic goal of the environmental movement is to gain political control over society so that they can implement their control over private as well as government land, property and business, and that is a clear explanation of socialism as well as communism.
All running candidates for the office of president support the basic issues relating to global warming, none have any reasonable education in the connecting sciences, all are supporters of Cultural Marxism i.e. politically correctness and none has demonstrated the nerve or inclination to challenge environmentalist dogma.

3) The environmental movement, which is socialist in function as well as action, is without question responsible for a substantial part of our 21st century problems. Most well-intentioned members of organizations like the Sierra Club, Global Green, and Green Peace and others do not in reality understand the underlying issues and blindly support those organizations based on their desire to improve the general environment. This is not an indictment of these well meaning individuals their intentions are correct but they have been led astray.

Let’s examine some issues. You will recall the horrendous losses of the Pacific Northwest lumber industry based on environmental complaints that a particular species of Owl was endangered to become extinct based on the premise that these owls would only nest in old trees of the Pacific NW. This environmentally concocted BS story was widely accepted by the media which then distributed it extensively, the Spotted Owl had to be saved, and to accomplish that scores of saw mills, thousands of jobs, and several towns were all made redundant. Firstly the very concept that an owl cares about the age of a tree is moronic. Secondly six years later half a dozen pairs of Spotted Owls were found to be nesting in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park in everything from bridge abutments to remnants of the 1930’s world fair. The damage was done the lumber industry of the Pacific Northwest is still trying to recuperate.
In about 1965 some British scientists determined that the ozone layer over the South Polar Region was thinner than the rest. Then in the late 80’s NASA, which was at the time seeking funds for a new budget, invented the phrase “Ozone Hole”, which is a fabrication. Ozone Al Gore grabbed it and ran with it! There is no hole; the ozone layer is thinner at the Polar Regions during polar winters. Ozone is the product of the combining of three oxygen molecules into one ozone molecule. It is one of the lightest gases of our atmosphere. Ozone is created in only two ways, by the action of lighting, which does not occur during polar winters in the Polar Regions, and by solar radiation, which cannot occur in the dark.. Since there is no sunlight in the Polar Regions during the darkness (winter) of the polar winters and since there is no lighting no ozone is produced, thus the ozone layer over that region of the planet thins, only to increase in size when the summer comes. At some point Du Pont developed a product called Freon, which is a chlorofluorocarbon, and hydrochloroflurocarbon, which were used as a replacement for refrigerants previously used that, were poisonous. Du Pont patented Freon and Du Pont and its licensees became the only source of Freon in the world. When these patents were about to run out a story miraculously appeared that Freon was destroying the ozone layer and had to be replaced. Conveniently with a new Du Pont patented product. The only problem with this scenario is that Freon is one of the heaviest gases, immediately after release going to ground while ozone in one of the lightest, immediately after releaser rising. This fairy tale has cost society billions upon billions of dollars and the environmentalists and media are the sole parties responsible for those costs.
Southern California has always had severe fire problems particularly during the time that Santa Anna winds blow up from the south, in order to prevent damage the counties as well as the state of California, when I lived there in the 60’s the state cut frequent fire breaks in the grasslands and brush so as to enable the local fire departments to control brush and forest fires. Beginning in the late 70’s and early 80’s the environmental movement convinced the counties and state to stop cutting fire brakes due to the endangered kangaroo rat. How a kangaroo rat even determined that a firebreak was detrimental to his environment none ever explained. The net result of these actions was the destruction of thousands of homes and the loss of billions in loses due to uncontrollable fires that rampaged throughout Southern California.
Before we continue I want the reader to clearly understand that we are environmentalists, but ones who bases their convictions and actions on science not on PC crap coming out of politicians and unschooled environmentalist mouths.
The most practical means for man to produce electric energy in the 21st century is with nuclear electric generation. It is basically clean; it produces little or no CO2. It is cheap unless over-regulated. Today we have third generation reactors that are totally safe but not one has been built in North America, these create the smallest environmental impact. Since the occurrence at Pittsburgh’s Three Mile Island where a reactor core failed, and which by the way did not hurt one single blade of grass, the environmentalists have been on a relentless crusade against the nuclear industry. Typified was the Clam Shell Alliance produced bumper sticker, “Burn Wood not Atoms”. The incredible stupidity of that short statement in our mind has always typified the entire environmental movement that we have always considered to be related to the 19th century Malthusians and the 20th century Club of Rome, neither of which have ever made a prediction that came true. In the nuclear case the environmentalists took a new and differing tack, they, instead of attacking the industry, directly pressured the Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulation Commission (NRC) to so regulate the construction of generating stations as to make their building financially impossible. This reached the point where permits based on submitted design were issued and after construction began were rescinded and replaced with new and different regulations and parameters. Over half a dozen plants were terminated in mid construction due to this. I do want to impress on the reader that Chernobyl the worst nuclear accident in history could not take place in any American generating plant because we do not build graphite reactors and we do not build reactors without containment structures, only the Soviets (socialists) did that. The Japanese catastrophe could have been avoided had the operator paid heed to the engineering study produced 20 years ago (40 years after construction) that recommended the construction of concrete containment vessels over each reactor. The producer fired the engineering company and buried the reports. Those reactors operating today that do not have concert cupolas were built over 40 years and designed in the late 40’s. Once again the environmental movement is having second thoughts on this issue as they also did in the previous cases. V. J. Krieg used to say that the most dangerous people in America were the thousands of uneducated Do-Gooders.
It is always wise to look behind the scenes of any political or social movements. There after all is an agenda, a plan and a desired outcome. In the case of this environmental movement the agenda as well as the outcome are hidden from the general membership. We have a recommendation for you, because if we provide the answer you will not believe us. All environmental movements are tax-exempt; it is relatively simple to obtain a copy of their annual IRS filings, when you have your copy be certain to look at the total income and make a comparison of income vs. expenditures, and when you’ve completed then look up the pay of the officers and directors and their perks, you will be amazed. The agenda is control of land and property by a socialist state, and the outcome is communal control of society, family and community.

4) Of all the ideas and actions of man of the last 200 years the dumbest is without question the production of ethanol as a additive or replacement fuel for fossil fuel vehicles.

In 2007 America consumed 138 million tons of corn to produce ethanol. This was accomplished through the massive subsidy of fertilizers, farm fuel, farm subsidies, transport subsidies, and distillery subsidies. It is common knowledge that the entire production chain from seed stock to the end ethanol product is in one way or another subsidized by your tax dollars. Since farm acreage that was previously used to grow food for humans and animals as well as grain for export, which has now been reduced, we are developing international food shortages, higher trade deficits and massive price increases in all food stock. Utilization of ethanol distillation as animal feed stock eases this problem only slightly.
Anyone who does not reside in the hallowed halls of congress or academia, or in the executive and has to actually go to the supermarkets to shop for food does not need to be told of the horrendous price increases in our foods. Wheat has doubled and along with that pasta and bread, eggs are up 17%, tomatoes have doubled, beef, pork, poultry, everything has gone up because corn is the primary feedstock for farm animals.
The situation has reached the point where food riots that is the vestige of long ago have become commonplace in some parts of the world. Rice, which has also doubled, is the first grain to be rationed in America since WWII. Costco and Sam’s Club both are as of May of 2008 restricting purchses to only single bags. While there are other causes ethanol is certainly the major reason for this.
Ethanol is singularly poor for a fuel for numerous reasons. Firstly it is not as combustible as gasoline and is therefore about 30% less effective as a fuel for motor vehicles than gasoline. This results in lower gas mileage when used alone or if used as a mixture with gasoline. Secondly being alcohol based it attacks rubber one of the principal raw materials of engine components, seals, gaskets, and hosing on autos and trucks. This results in higher maintenance costs and lower lifespan. Thirdly while it is domestically produced, once all the subsidies are added in it is actually more expensive to produce or use than imported fossil fuel, and due to production methods produces more pollution than refined oil.
The commonly asked question is if all that is true why are we using this stuff? The answer to that is simply, Agribusiness is one of America’s largest industries. It is also the most government-subsidized industry in America. Also understand that none of these subsidies go to family farms, this is strictly a big-agri-business industry. I know, I farmed for 14 years and could never get any subsidy, or help from the Department of Agriculture, or any government benefit for that matter. One of my neighbors farmed 1,700 acres another had a 300-cow dairy farm they also got peanuts. But there are a whole host of senators, congressmen, and TV personalities who are reaping millions in farm subsidies even though they probably can’t tell a cow’s ass from her head. All the rest of the subsidies go to agri-business, which are farms owned by stockholders consisting of 5 to 10 thousand acres.
One more point. Fuel consumption by automobiles is not any straightforward simple matter. In a test done in the UK (BBC Top Gear) a Toyota Prius (darling car of the uninformed) was put on a racetrack. The car was fueled and the driver was told to go around the track as fast as he could for one hour. A V-8 Supercharged Jaguar was also fueled and told to follow the Prius, The results: The Prius got 17.4 miles per gallon and the Jaguar got 19.7 miles per gallon.

5) Coal liquefaction is the process of converting anthracite coal into various liquid as well as gaseous forms of fossil fuel; in fact most carbon based items used by man. The Germans during WWI and WWII developed the process in the 1900’s. It was perfected during WWII and used extensively by the Germans to produce all petroleum-based and many carbon-based by-products from the early 30’s to 1946.

The world’s largest remaining coal liquidation operation is the remnant of the white South African government in RSA. When in a fit of political correctness the UN under American and British leadership brought sanctions against South Africa for their racial separation policies the South Africans located some German engineers and built their Sasol plants. Today Sasol is the world’s largest coal liquefaction and gasification operator, employing over 30,000 people. With profitable revenues producing sales of $4.153 billions. Sasol utilizes the Fisher-Tropsch process that was used by the Germans.

With the newer developed Sequestration process it is now possible to at some added expense produce oil, gasoline, diesel and propane products from coal without excessive CO2 emissions. What however is much more notable is that production costs of liquefied coal can be carried out at a break-even cost of $47. Per barrel, which equates to 0.85.5 Cents per gallon of gasoline. China has a small plant operational that is producing fuel at $35 per barrel of gasoline.

Now, we have some very serious questions. Why are we importing oil at costs that exceed our ability to produce the very same product at less than half the cost? Why is our government actively perusing the production of ethanol at a cost of over three times that of coal liquefaction? Exactly what are the people at our Department of Energy doing in implementing policies that are destructive of our economy and world food supplies? Why is congress not acting on this matter and why is the executive pushing ethanol production?

Why is America spending billions of dollars on “Green Energy” projects, into which Dr. Chu head of the Department of Energy has so far spent $6.7 billion financing green energy projects all of which have gone belly up, and continues to spend more. To paraphrase Einstein, “the definition of an idiot is a person who does the same failed thing over and over again in hopes of attaining a different result”.

6) As listed in this article the United States when all in ground oil reserves are tabulated has more oil than the entire Middle East.

7) The Wars. No discussion of any matter relating to our economy in 2011 or the issues of discussion is possible today without Considering The Wars, which we are involved in obviously not for our national interests. Like 9-11 all we can come up with is more questions than answers.

To recap briefly, the war against Iraq both the first George Bush and then his son and then by Obama were implemented based on lies, misinformation, and fabrications primarily produced by the Mossad. Issues of the phony Yellow Cake purchase by Iraq from Niger with documentation produced in Jerusalem and transmitted via the Italian and the British MI-5 to the CIA were part of this charade. All of the allegations made by Secretary of State Colin Powel at the UN General Assembly proved later to have been fabricated by the NSA, CIA and the Mossad. Both wars were constitutionally illegal, pointless and not to American but to Israeli advantage. This is no different than the passed fabrication of a nuclear reactor by Syria in the middle of a desert, without any security, with no available water for cooling, without any air defense, and without a containment structure. I hold several patents in the field and have supplied machinery to almost all North American reactors and know this industry. The new war begun by Obama is just more of the same. Libya has the highest per capita income in Africa, the highest private home ownership, the highest car ownership, free healthcare and free education, but does not want to be paid in paper dollars for its oil—thus war.
The situation in Afghanistan, which seems to be deteriorating daily, is not much different. Considering the fact that the Taliban (imaginary enemy) had eliminated heroin production in which Afghanistan was the world leader makes me think of some ulterior motives. This is especially the case because under our installed CIA puppet president, (the procurator of Kabul) heroin production in Afghanistan has once again propelled them into number one producer in the world.
The fact that the American installed leadership in both Iraq as well as Afghanistan does not have the support of the indigenous population and both are CIA procurators is common knowledge. As is the realization that in both nations as well a Libya we are confronted by civil wars in which we as well as NATO have no business to be.
The Al-Quaeda construct that has now been openly confronted on BBC as being an invention of the CIA is in many respects comical. Consider the accusing of our government that a bunch of Islamic clerics that have the science education of a sixth grader, located in caves in Peshawar and parts of Afghanistan, organized the most complicated international act of terrorism in world history, employing over 100 individuals. The CIA claimed that instructions were sent via Cell-phones, there was no cell phone towers in that region of the world, and I know I was there. It is no different than the claimed 9-11 hijacked airliner that crashed in PA in which we were told that Cell calls from passengers were made to relatives, when it was later proven that at the time it was impossible to cell call out of an airliner at that time. Then came the ludicrous story that between two and three men wielding box cutters dominated between 60 and 130 people on single aircrafts is idiotic. We have all been assumed to be fools by the people who have propagated these lies.

8) The food crisis, which is the rapid expansion of the cost of food, is directly linked to the production of ethanol by harvesting of corn. The fact that ethanol production can only be sustained with massive government subsidies is well known. From planting seed to distillation every single process including distribution and even fuels used by ferments is subsidized by taxes. The actual cost of ethanol makes it non-performing in economic terms. Like “Bird Swatters”, (Air Turbines) and “Crop Covers” (solar panels) it is and attempt at non-scientific solution that cannot and will-not work. In order to run a city the size of LA the entire state of Nevada would have to be covered with solar panels and every ridge with wind turbines, and then an energy storage plant encompassing 20 square miles would be required to maintain constant service.

In view of the aforementioned information let us now consider our present and planned national energy policy. At present America does not have a coherent energy production policy of any kind. Our government’s policy under Bush was plain and simple the enrichment of Bush’s buddies and companies in which members of the administration hold shares, much has changed with Obama. Now we have a national policy to destroy fossil fuel as an energy source and replace it with bird swatters and crop covers which today produce less than 3% of our consumed annual energy needs.
Statements by the presidential front-runners all of which lack any reasonable understanding of the issue have made several proposals. Proposals to suspend the federal excise tax on fuel for the summer months. What a great idea, Let’s see, the federal government deficit spends through free trade and borrows money by selling T-bills to China, then we take the borrowed money and purchase oil from Venezuela, Nigeria and the Middle East keeping 18.4 cents per gallon as taxes. States and counties then compound the problem by adding on average another 0.27 cents in taxes on an imported commodity that has already been taxed to death. This as columnist Thomas Freedman stated is not an energy policy it is a money-laundering scheme. At least Barack Obama has the good sense not to endorse stupidity, but has unfortunately not articulated any reasonable policy of his own. One would think that at least congress would have produced some sort of national policy for taxation, or spending. Far from it. In fact congress has done nothing except to let tax credits for solar and wind produced energy die, while at the same time keeping all benefits for fossil fuel. Neither Congress nor the Executive has done anything to streamline DOE or the Nuclear Energy Commission. . Not only has there been no policy there are no plans for any policy.
What should we do as a national energy policy? In philosophic terms we should encourage energy savings through rational user policies. These would include, taxing the hell out of gas-guzzlers, granting personal tax write offs for energy saving devices installed in homes. Allowing an instant tax rebate for all motor vehicles whose energy consumption is less than 30 mpg. Require all electronic manufacturers to have their devices disconnect from the power net 15 minutes after the device is turned off. Offer tax credits for all home and business appliances that are below average in energy consumption. Allow tax credits for all passive solar energy saving means. Allow a 100% write off of any installed geothermal air conditioning and heating systems and provide tax write-offs for solar and wind produced electricity to homeowners. .
In production we should force the DOE to produce policy that will once again foster the construction of nuclear electric energy plants. Force the environmentalists and Nevada residents to accept the nuclear waste depository at Yucca Mountain. Eliminate immediately all government subsidies to ethanol production. We should offer tax exception for ten years to anyone building and producing coal liquefaction production plants utilizing clean conversion technologies. We should offer tax credits for solar as well as wind electric energy production. Eliminate all tax write offs for the petrochemical industry over the next ten years at a rate of 10% per year. Offer American automotive producers a tax break for all energy saving car and truck model’s whose energy consumption is below half of the average consumption rate as of 2009. And lastly demand that the three huge oil fields in Alaska are accessed only for American domestic consumption and refining and build at least five new refineries.

Proposed A3P Position Paper on Energy
Prepared by A. H. Krieg

Energy & Food Crisis
Made in Washington

“The most common lies are those by which politicians deceive the public; other dishonesty of the public is rare.”

Let us outline some observations. 1) There is no energy crisis. 2) Global warming (cooling) is the product of the sun and not of man. 3) Most of our present problems are attributable to the environmental movement. 4) Ethanol as a fuel for vehicles is stupid. 5) If we should ever run out of oil we have enough anthracite coal for the next six centuries. 6) North America has the largest oil & natural gas reserve deposits in the world. 7) The wars and all the afore listed problems are interrelated and have nothing to do with energy or food and everything to do with political control and power. 8) Food price increases are in large part due to the production of ethanol.

Let us clarify that last sentence. It is our opinion as well as those of many scientists, geologists, climateologists and engineers that all of the presently touted energy related problems are a fabrication of the “Republocrat System”, for the sole purpose of achieving control of society. Those in the environmental movement are the dupes of these elitists and unknowingly carry out their agenda. We do not make this claim lightly and will in due course provide ample evidence of this position.

1) There is no energy crisis, it is a fabrication produced in the political capitols of the world and its main sources are Washington and Brussels. The principal protagonists of this fiction are the well meaning but un-informed members of the environmental movement and the political party known as the Republocrats and Eurocrarts, and politicians who either curry votes of the greens or pander to them, and politicians that are members of the elites. Shocking as this statement is, it is our opinion and is correct.

A primary premise of the supporters of the cause of energy related problems is that energy in the form of fossil fuels is a finite commodity and that we are on the verge of running out of oil, coal and natural gas. (Fossil fuels). First and foremost the reader must understand that oil and natural gas are only a part of the fossil fuels with which God has endowed our planet. The by far larger deposits of fossil fuel is coal and of coal the most useful is anthracite, coal that can be liquefied to produce natural gas as well as all petroleum based products we presently produce from oil. The technology to do this is about 90 years old having been developed by the Germans in the 1920’s. Sasol is a South African company traded on the NY stock exchange that operates a substantial number of coal liquidation plants in South Africa. Please do Goggle Sasol. While America has the world’s largest proven reserves of anthracite, (over 600 years at present consumption rate), South Africa has the second largest deposits. Coal liquidation is much less expensive than purchasing oil from OPEC nations.

Overall oil and natural gas deposits in the Beaufort Sea principally in the region of Gull Island and extending about 40 miles from it on what is commonly called the Alaskan North Slope combined with the Kuparuck fields covering an area of about 30 x 60 square miles is larger than the combined oil reserves of Iraq and Saudi Arabia combined. Gull Island that is located about 5 nautical miles from Prudhoe Bay could produce so much oil that the Alaska pipeline would have to be expanded five fold. Wellhead pressure on the surface is 90 pounds; the oil does not even have to be pumped. The same holds true for the Kuparuck field.

The Gull island fields have not produced one single dry well in an arc stretching 40 miles out from the island. All the chemistry is identical so it is one single pool of oil under 90 pounds per square inch of pressure extending 40 miles out into the Beaufort Sea. Just one capped well came in at 30,000 barrels per day through a 3 ½” pipe. For size the operating Prudhoe Bay field is presently pumping two million barrels a day Gull island could dwarf that and potential output and the Kuparuck field is fifty times larger. What is even more interesting is that the sulfur content of this oil is very low a chemical analysis indicate 0.90% Sulfur, wax content 6% Asphalt content 2% pour point –15 deg. F.

The Bakken field is the largest domestic oil discovery since Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay, it is estimated at 503 billion barrels. (U.S. Geological Survey report) The technical name is the Williston Basin and it stretches from Northern Montana through North Dakota and into Canada. Furthermore it is what is technically called light sweet oil, whose production cost is only $16. per barrel. That by itself is sufficient oil for American consumption through 2041 if production had begun in 2006. Placing this into perspective just this field has eight times more than Saudi Arabia, 18 times more that Iraq, and 21 times more than Kuwait.

To place this into historic perspective we need to go back to the 1973 oil embargo and the consequential energy shortages that ensued during the Tricky Dick Nixon administration. The fact is, that historically the entire episode was man made and Nixon was right in the middle of it all. As the shortage expanded Maine governor Kenneth M. Curtis accused Nixon of purposely fabricating the shortages. Then in the same year the Philadelphia Inquirer in a lengthy article proved that Exxon, Mobile, Texaco, Gulf, and Standard oil of California were exporting two barrels of oil at higher price for every one they sold domestically. Lloyds of London is a principal insurer of tankers. According to their records the number of tankers departing the Middle East for Europe (1973) and America was slightly larger during the shortage than four months before. The rise in tanker departures rose from 474 to 492.

In 1977 the total North American oil reserve deposits in ground were expanded by about 88% and roughly three quarters of these were drilled, however those in North America have in large part been capped because they are owned by one of the previously named “Seven Sisters” which earns greater profit on imported crude and refined product than that on that produced in America. Then in ‘77 Carter created the Department of Energy enacted in 1980. (Just as the shortages became pronounced) DOE has had some successes as they expanded the energy shortage and lengthened it in duration, and then they created the draconian nuclear energy fiasco that dismantled our only nuclear fuel reprocessing plant, that Carter shut down, selling it in parts to BNFL in the UK and made the construction of nuclear electric generating plants impossible because of costs related to by over-regulation. Since the creation of the Department of Energy (1980) American oil production has fallen from about 27% of domestic consumption to about 14%. When Carter established the DOE he stated that he DOE would reverse the trend of imported oil and make America energy independent. It is doing the exact opposite!

Reliable but unnamed sources (from ARCO) in 1975 as reported by former Secretary of Sate of Colorado Hough Chase claimed that the government allowed only one field out of three to be drilled in Alaska and that there was sufficient supply in the Beaufort Sea to meet America’s oil needs for the next 200 years, without pumping, because in ground pressure was sufficient to meet the output. Furthermore according to this source market expansion was figured in. Drilled wells in all three fields indicate three separate deposits confirmed by differing chemical analysis of all wells drilled in each of the fields. All wells, (about 40 of them) were required to be capped by the government. The North Slope oil fields consist of an area of over 50,000 Square miles. ARCO, Chaplin, Lindsey Williams made a second corroboration of this when he stated,” There will never be an energy crisis because we have as much oil as does Saudi Arabia.” Williams was Chaplin for the thousands of pipeline workers and roughnecks who were employed in Alaska during the exploration and pipeline construction.

Shortly after discovery of these oil deposits the government ordered all geological reports locked up and all wells capped on Gull Island and its surrounding fields as well as the thirty by sixty mile Kuparuck field. The reported reason by Washington was that environmentalist claimed that any possible spill would cause an environmental catastrophe. This is akin to not scrambling eggs because you might miss the bowl with the yoke after you broke the shell.

The Hudson Institute (look up on internet) stated in 1977 that Carter was wrong in saying” we stand no chance of becoming energy independent”. Available information on energy based on scientifically peer-reviewed information reveals the following (this was in ’77) Continental (48 state) in ground deposits 150 billion barrels, the ’77 API report stated an estimated 303.5 billion barrels, “68 Geological survey Atlantic ocean continental shelf 224 billion barrels, Pacific coast 275 billion barrels, Alaska 502 billion barrels, for a total of 1,576 billion barrels in ground. And all this was before the Bakken discovery. The government in its infinite wisdom has seen to it that only 2% of the proven reserves have been licensed. These deposits are enough oil at present national growth rate (19 million barrel a day consumption USA) to see to our total needs for the next 200 years, In a 1972 report the Wall Street Journal stated that we have enough natural gas deposits for the next 1,000 years. Total in ground deposits in the Continental (lower 48 states) and continental shelves are estimated at 758 trillion cubic feet. This does not include Alaska. In a book of the Hudson Institute by Herman Kahn we learn that of the fossil fuels (oil, coal, natural gas, coal shale, and tar sand) we could easily supply the entire world with fossil fuels for the next several hundred years.
The once seven sisters are now consolidated into the five sisters, which are Exxon, Chevron-Texaco, BP, Shell and Conoco-Philips. Just imagine how simple it is for a consortium of five companies in collusion with the government to control all of our energy needs. Bear in mind that these companies also control the mining of most uranium, coal, oil as well as natural gas. Remember that the government either controls all known deposits of any size while the sisters have the rest locked up for the next 100-years in land mineral leases. These companies have two policies, 1) optimize profit in the short term, and 2) optimize in ground deposits for maximum long gevity and profit. It goes without saying that all steps are taken to ensure fossil fuel dependence permanently. And just to ensure that they have also locked up North American uranium, and all coal deposits.

American oil
Field average depth size
Prudhoe 600 ft 100 Sq. Mi.
Kuparuck 300 ft 200 Sq. Mi
Gull Island 1200 ft very large total size unknown
Bakken 2000 ft 800 +Sq. Mi.

All three leading presidential candidates for 2012 have incoherent energy policies none of the 2012 candidates of either party have articulated any energy policies and are unaware of the realities existing in this sector of the economy. The Obama administration into its last year has not produced any viable energy policy at all except to provide Brazil’s Petrobras two billion credit for deep-water oil production off the Brazilian coast and shutting down America’s Gulf deep-water production and financing Columbian oil refining plants.
At least to McCain’s credit he had proposes an expansion of nuclear generation. Obama on the other hand comes up with silly environmental wind generation and solar electric algae fuel production that could not under any circumstances produce more than 10% of our energy needs within the next 20 years. Such PC crap and that is exactly what it is, wastes our time and resources.

2) The world’s major problems are attributable to false environmental actions taken by society due to misinformation published by environmental organizations and the propagation of this misinformation by the media and energy producers that gain profit through it. These include among others that, global warming is due to man, (Climate change?) Freon caused the Ozone hole, CO2 is harmful to the planet, Cutting fire breaks is somehow harmful to animals, pipelines impede migratory species, nuclear energy production is dangerous, governments should be the stewards of land, and burning wood is better than splitting atoms. (Clamshell Alliance)

In December of 2007 over 100 world scientists sent a poignant letter to the Secretary of the UN Mr. Ban Ki-Moon. I want to emphasize that these were not the frequently by the media quoted members of the Union of Concerned Scientists that require such stringent qualifications for association that several dogs and cats have attained membership. No, these are real professors, PhD’s, lecturers and doctors. Among the writers were; Dr. Antonio Zichichi President of the World Federation of Scientists, Dr. Reid Byson the father of modern meteorology, Dr. Syun-Ichi Akasofu of the international Arctic Research Center, twice named one of the worlds most cited scientists, Dr. Richard Lindzen UN IPCC scientist, among others. The most remarkable thing about the list is that it contains almost no Americans; most of our so-called scientists are cowards in opposing the PC political/environmental movement.

The letter in stark terms warns against the existing “movement of “futile” climate control efforts”. Among other things it clearly states “ Significant new peer-reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human caused global warming”. The fact of the matter is that today most atmospheric scientists, geologists, and climateologists agree that man’s input or ability to alter global climatic conditions are limited to the point of being useless.

The IPCC is the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; it is the major producer of data relating to climate. Unfortunately their reports circulate among politicians and non-scientists who frequently draw incorrect conclusions about the issue. Furthermore these reports are prepared by a small number of politically active core writers who are subject to tremendous pressure from PC academia as well as environmental activists. Their conclusions are for the most part outcome based driven and never peer reviewed thereby making them worthless. The vast majority of thousands of qualified scientists, climateologists, geologists, and atmospheric specialist are never consulted about the conclusions reached by the IPCC. Summaries of issues presented by the IPCC do not therefore represent any consensus view of scientists in fields related to global warming. The IPCC is a politically motivated organization whose conclusions can be proven wrong with ease.
When former VP Ozone (I invented the Internet) Al Gore whose academic record is not particularly impressive and whose environmental credentials are most suspect when his lifestyle and personal energy consumption record is accessed, and then makes wild statements, which are unproven and in many cases totally wrong becomes the spokesperson for a cause, we become wary. Our disdain for Gore goes all the way back to his ghost written book Earth in the Balance, which had over 50 scientific errors in the first twenty pages. Michael More the progressive socialist Democrat from the left coast who is the darling of the environmentalist movement can realistically be classified as uneducated lout.

From the letter to the UN Secretary General;
*Recent observations of phenomenon such as glacial retreats, seal-level rise and the migration of temperature-sensitive species are not evidence for abnormal climate change, for none of these changes has been shown to lie outside the bounds of known natural variability.
*The average rate of warming of 0.1 to 0.2 degrees Celsius per decade recorded by satellites during the late 20th century falls within known natural rates of warming and cooling over the last 10,000 years.
*Leading scientists, including some senior IPCC representatives, acknowledge that today’s computer models cannot predict climate. Consistent with this, and despite computer projections of temperature rises, there has been no net global warming since 1998. That current temperature plateau follows a late 20th-century period of warming is consistent with the continuation today of natural multi-decade or millennial climate cycling.

The entire environmental movement is strongly connected with socialist political elements that have outcome based plans and are utilizing this issue as a vehicle to achieve their desired socialist goals. The fact that the political left i.e. the socialists is the closest ally of the environmental movement is a proven fact. In Germany per example where this issue has gained primary national prominence the Greens (Die Gruenen) and the gays (Die Bunten) Buentniss 90 (The old Communist Green party of the DDR) and the German Socialists formed a union and controlled the government for over a decade. The basic goal of the socialists is to gain political power over property and land, by being elected to govern, the basic goal of the environmental movement is to gain political control over society so that they can implement their control over private as well as government land, property and business, and that is a clear explanation of socialism as well as communism.

All running candidates for the office of president support the basic issues relating to global warming, none have any reasonable education in the connecting sciences, all are supporters of Cultural Marxism i.e. politically correctness and none has demonstrated the nerve or inclination to challenge environmentalist dogma.

3) The environmental movement, which is socialist in function as well as action, is without question responsible for a substantial part of our 21st century problems. Most well-intentioned members of organizations like the Sierra Club, Global Green, and Green Peace and others do not in reality understand the underlying issues and blindly support those organizations based on their desire to improve the general environment. This is not an indictment of these well meaning individuals their intentions are correct but they have been led astray.

Let’s examine some issues. You will recall the horrendous losses of the Pacific Northwest lumber industry based on environmental complaints that a particular species of Owl was endangered to become extinct based on the premise that these owls would only nest in old trees of the Pacific NW. This environmentally concocted BS story was widely accepted by the media which then distributed it extensively, the Spotted Owl had to be saved, and to accomplish that scores of saw mills, thousands of jobs, and several towns were all made redundant. Firstly the very concept that an owl cares about the age of a tree is moronic. Secondly six years later half a dozen pairs of Spotted Owls were found to be nesting in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park in everything from bridge abutments to remnants of the 1930’s world fair. The damage was done the lumber industry of the Pacific Northwest is still trying to recuperate.

In about 1965 some British scientists determined that the ozone layer over the South Polar Region was thinner than the rest. Then in the late 80’s NASA, which was at the time seeking funds for a new budget, invented the phrase “Ozone Hole”, which is a fabrication. Ozone Al Gore grabbed it and ran with it! There is no hole; the ozone layer is thinner at the Polar Regions during polar winters. Ozone is the product of the combining of three oxygen molecules into one ozone molecule. It is one of the lightest gases of our atmosphere. Ozone is created in only two ways, by the action of lighting, which does not occur during polar winters in the Polar Regions, and by solar radiation, which cannot occur in the dark.. Since there is no sunlight in the Polar Regions during the darkness (winter) of the polar winters and since there is no lighting no ozone is produced, thus the ozone layer over that region of the planet thins, only to increase in size when the summer comes. At some point Du Pont developed a product called Freon, which is a chlorofluorocarbon, and hydrochloroflurocarbon, which were used as a replacement for refrigerants previously used that, were poisonous. Du Pont patented Freon and Du Pont and its licensees became the only source of Freon in the world. When these patents were about to run out a story miraculously appeared that Freon was destroying the ozone layer and had to be replaced. Conveniently with a new Du Pont patented product. The only problem with this scenario is that Freon is one of the heaviest gases, immediately after release going to ground while ozone in one of the lightest, immediately after releaser rising. This fairy tale has cost society billions upon billions of dollars and the environmentalists and media are the sole parties responsible for those costs.

Southern California has always had severe fire problems particularly during the time that Santa Anna winds blow up from the south, in order to prevent damage the counties as well as the state of California, when I lived there in the 60’s the state cut frequent fire breaks in the grasslands and brush so as to enable the local fire departments to control brush and forest fires. Beginning in the late 70’s and early 80’s the environmental movement convinced the counties and state to stop cutting fire brakes due to the endangered kangaroo rat. How a kangaroo rat even determined that a firebreak was detrimental to his environment none ever explained. The net result of these actions was the destruction of thousands of homes and the loss of billions in loses due to uncontrollable fires that rampaged throughout Southern California.

Before we continue I want the reader to clearly understand that we are environmentalists, but ones who bases their convictions and actions on science not on PC crap coming out of politicians and unschooled environmentalist mouths.
The most practical means for man to produce electric energy in the 21st century is with nuclear electric generation. It is basically clean; it produces little or no CO2. It is cheap unless over-regulated. Today we have third generation reactors that are totally safe but not one has been built in North America, these create the smallest environmental impact. Since the occurrence at Pittsburgh’s Three Mile Island where a reactor core failed, and which by the way did not hurt one single blade of grass, the environmentalists have been on a relentless crusade against the nuclear industry. Typified was the Clam Shell Alliance produced bumper sticker, “Burn Wood not Atoms”. The incredible stupidity of that short statement in our mind has always typified the entire environmental movement that we have always considered to be related to the 19th century Malthusians and the 20th century Club of Rome, neither of which have ever made a prediction that came true. In the nuclear case the environmentalists took a new and differing tack, they, instead of attacking the industry, directly pressured the Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulation Commission (NRC) to so regulate the construction of generating stations as to make their building financially impossible. This reached the point where permits based on submitted design were issued and after construction began were rescinded and replaced with new and different regulations and parameters. Over half a dozen plants were terminated in mid construction due to this. I do want to impress on the reader that Chernobyl the worst nuclear accident in history could not take place in any American generating plant because we do not build graphite reactors and we do not build reactors without containment structures, only the Soviets (socialists) did that. The Japanese catastrophe could have been avoided had the operator paid heed to the engineering study produced 20 years ago (40 years after construction) that recommended the construction of concrete containment vessels over each reactor. The producer fired the engineering company and buried the reports. Those reactors operating today that do not have concert cupolas were built over 40 years and designed in the late 40’s. Once again the environmental movement is having second thoughts on this issue as they also did in the previous cases. V. J. Krieg used to say that the most dangerous people in America were the thousands of uneducated Do-Gooders.

It is always wise to look behind the scenes of any political or social movements. There after all is an agenda, a plan and a desired outcome. In the case of this environmental movement the agenda as well as the outcome are hidden from the general membership. We have a recommendation for you, because if we provide the answer you will not believe us. All environmental movements are tax-exempt; it is relatively simple to obtain a copy of their annual IRS filings, when you have your copy be certain to look at the total income and make a comparison of income vs. expenditures, and when you’ve completed then look up the pay of the officers and directors and their perks, you will be amazed. The agenda is control of land and property by a socialist state, and the outcome is communal control of society, family and community.

4) Of all the ideas and actions of man of the last 200 years the dumbest is without question the production of ethanol as a additive or replacement fuel for fossil fuel vehicles.

In 2007 America consumed 138 million tons of corn to produce ethanol. This was accomplished through the massive subsidy of fertilizers, farm fuel, farm subsidies, transport subsidies, and distillery subsidies. It is common knowledge that the entire production chain from seed stock to the end ethanol product is in one way or another subsidized by your tax dollars. Since farm acreage that was previously used to grow food for humans and animals as well as grain for export, which has now been reduced, we are developing international food shortages, higher trade deficits and massive price increases in all food stock. Utilization of ethanol distillation as animal feed stock eases this problem only slightly.

Anyone who does not reside in the hallowed halls of congress or academia, or in the executive and has to actually go to the supermarkets to shop for food does not need to be told of the horrendous price increases in our foods. Wheat has doubled and along with that pasta and bread, eggs are up 17%, tomatoes have doubled, beef, pork, poultry, everything has gone up because corn is the primary feedstock for farm animals.

The situation has reached the point where food riots that is the vestige of long ago have become commonplace in some parts of the world. Rice, which has also doubled, is the first grain to be rationed in America since WWII. Costco and Sam’s Club both are as of May of 2008 restricting purchses to only single bags. While there are other causes ethanol is certainly the major reason for this.

Ethanol is singularly poor for a fuel for numerous reasons. Firstly it is not as combustible as gasoline and is therefore about 30% less effective as a fuel for motor vehicles than gasoline. This results in lower gas mileage when used alone or if used as a mixture with gasoline. Secondly being alcohol based it attacks rubber one of the principal raw materials of engine components, seals, gaskets, and hosing on autos and trucks. This results in higher maintenance costs and lower lifespan. Thirdly while it is domestically produced, once all the subsidies are added in it is actually more expensive to produce or use than imported fossil fuel, and due to production methods produces more pollution than refined oil.

The commonly asked question is if all that is true why are we using this stuff? The answer to that is simply, Agribusiness is one of America’s largest industries. It is also the most government-subsidized industry in America. Also understand that none of these subsidies go to family farms, this is strictly a big-agri-business industry. I know, I farmed for 14 years and could never get any subsidy, or help from the Department of Agriculture, or any government benefit for that matter. One of my neighbors farmed 1,700 acres another had a 300-cow dairy farm they also got peanuts. But there are a whole host of senators, congressmen, and TV personalities who are reaping millions in farm subsidies even though they probably can’t tell a cow’s ass from her head. All the rest of the subsidies go to agri-business, which are farms owned by stockholders consisting of 5 to 10 thousand acres.

One more point. Fuel consumption by automobiles is not any straightforward simple matter. In a test done in the UK (BBC Top Gear) a Toyota Prius (darling car of the uninformed) was put on a racetrack. The car was fueled and the driver was told to go around the track as fast as he could for one hour. A V-8 Supercharged Jaguar was also fueled and told to follow the Prius, The results: The Prius got 17.4 miles per gallon and the Jaguar got 19.7 miles per gallon.

5) Coal liquefaction is the process of converting anthracite coal into various liquid as well as gaseous forms of fossil fuel; in fact most carbon based items used by man. The Germans during WWI and WWII developed the process in the 1900’s. It was perfected during WWII and used extensively by the Germans to produce all petroleum-based and many carbon-based by-products from the early 30’s to 1946.

The world’s largest remaining coal liquidation operation is the remnant of the white South African government in RSA. When in a fit of political correctness the UN under American and British leadership brought sanctions against South Africa for their racial separation policies the South Africans located some German engineers and built their Sasol plants. Today Sasol is the world’s largest coal liquefaction and gasification operator, employing over 30,000 people. With profitable revenues producing sales of $4.153 billions. Sasol utilizes the Fisher-Tropsch process that was used by the Germans.

With the newer developed Sequestration process it is now possible to at some added expense produce oil, gasoline, diesel and propane products from coal without excessive CO2 emissions. What however is much more notable is that production costs of liquefied coal can be carried out at a break-even cost of $47. Per barrel, which equates to 0.85.5 Cents per gallon of gasoline. China has a small plant operational that is producing fuel at $35 per barrel of gasoline.

Now, we have some very serious questions. Why are we importing oil at costs that exceed our ability to produce the very same product at less than half the cost? Why is our government actively perusing the production of ethanol at a cost of over three times that of coal liquefaction? Exactly what are the people at our Department of Energy doing in implementing policies that are destructive of our economy and world food supplies? Why is congress not acting on this matter and why is the executive pushing ethanol production?

Why is America spending billions of dollars on “Green Energy” projects, into which Dr. Chu head of the Department of Energy has so far spent $6.7 billion financing green energy projects all of which have gone belly up, and continues to spend more. As Einstein said, “the definition of an idiot is a person who does the same failed thing over and over again in hopes of attaining a different result”.

6) As listed in this article the United States when all in ground oil reserves are tabulated has more oil than the entire Middle East.

7) The Wars. No discussion of any matter relating to our economy in 2011 or the issues of discussion is possible today without Considering The Wars, which we are involved in obviously not for our national interests. Like 9-11 all we can come up with is more questions than answers.

To recap briefly, the war against Iraq both the first George Bush and then his son and then by Obama were implemented based on lies, misinformation, and fabrications primarily produced by the Mossad. Issues of the phony Yellow Cake purchase by Iraq from Niger with documentation produced in Jerusalem and transmitted via the Italian and the British MI-5 to the CIA were part of this charade. All of the allegations made by Secretary of State Colin Powel at the UN General Assembly proved later to have been fabricated by the NSA, CIA and the Mossad. Both wars were constitutionally illegal, pointless and not to American but to Israeli advantage. This is no different than the passed fabrication of a nuclear reactor by Syria in the middle of a desert, without any security, with no available water for cooling, without any air defense, and without a containment structure. I hold several patents in the field and have supplied machinery to almost all North American reactors and know this industry. The new war begun by Obama is just more of the same. Libya has the highest per capita income in Africa, the highest private home ownership, the highest car ownership, free healthcare and free education, but does not want to be paid in paper dollars for its oil—thus war.

The situation in Afghanistan, which seems to be deteriorating daily, is not much different. Considering the fact that the Taliban (imaginary enemy) had eliminated heroin production in which Afghanistan was the world leader makes me think of some ulterior motives. This is especially the case because under our installed CIA puppet president, (the procurator of Kabul) heroin production in Afghanistan has once again propelled them into number one producer in the world.

The fact that the American installed leadership in both Iraq as well as Afghanistan does not have the support of the indigenous population and both are CIA procurators is common knowledge. As is the realization that in both nations as well a Libya we are confronted by civil wars in which we as well as NATO have no business to be.

The Al-Quaeda construct that has now been openly confronted on BBC as being an invention of the CIA is in many respects comical. Consider the accusing of our government that a bunch of Islamic clerics that have the science education of a sixth grader, located in caves in Peshawar and parts of Afghanistan, organized the most complicated international act of terrorism in world history, employing over 100 individuals. The CIA claimed that instructions were sent via Cell-phones, there was no cell phone towers in that region of the world, and I know I was there. It is no different than the claimed 9-11 hijacked airliner that crashed in PA in which we were told that Cell calls from passengers were made to relatives, when it was later proven that at the time it was impossible to cell call out of an airliner at that time. Then came the ludicrous story that between two and three men wielding box cutters dominated between 60 and 130 people on single aircrafts is idiotic. We have all been assumed to be fools by the people who have propagated these lies.

8) The food crisis, which is the rapid expansion of the cost of food, is directly linked to the production of ethanol by harvesting of corn. The fact that ethanol production can only be sustained with massive government subsidies is well known. From planting seed to distillation every single process including distribution and even fuels used by ferments is subsidized by taxes. The actual cost of ethanol makes it non-performing in economic terms. Like “Bird Swatters”, (Air Turbines) and “Crop Covers” (solar panels) it is and attempt at non-scientific solution that cannot and will-not work. In order to run a city the size of LA the entire state of Nevada would have to be covered with solar panels and every ridge with wind turbines, and then an energy storage plant encompassing 20 square miles would be required to maintain constant service.

In view of the aforementioned information let us now consider our present and planned national energy policy. At present America does not have a coherent energy production policy of any kind. Our government’s policy under Bush was plain and simple the enrichment of Bush’s buddies and companies in which members of the administration hold shares, much has changed with Obama. Now we have a national policy to destroy fossil fuel as an energy source and replace it with bird swatters and crop covers which today produce less than 3% of our consumed annual energy needs.

Statements by the presidential front-runners all of which lack any reasonable understanding of the issue have made several proposals. Proposals to suspend the federal excise tax on fuel for the summer months. What a great idea, Let’s see, the federal government deficit spends through free trade and borrows money by selling T-bills to China, then we take the borrowed money and purchase oil from Venezuela, Nigeria and the Middle East keeping 18.4 cents per gallon as taxes. States and counties then compound the problem by adding on average another 0.27 cents in taxes on an imported commodity that has already been taxed to death. This as columnist Thomas Freedman stated is not an energy policy it is a money-laundering scheme. At least Barack Obama has the good sense not to endorse stupidity, but has unfortunately not articulated any reasonable policy of his own. One would think that at least congress would have produced some sort of national policy for taxation, or spending. Far from it. In fact congress has done nothing except to let tax credits for solar and wind produced energy die, while at the same time keeping all benefits for fossil fuel. Neither Congress nor the Executive has done anything to streamline DOE or the Nuclear Energy Commission. Not only has there been no policy there are no plans for any policy.

What should we do as a national energy policy? In philosophic terms we should encourage energy savings through rational user policies. These would include, taxing the hell out of gas-guzzlers, granting personal tax write offs for energy saving devices installed in homes. Allowing an instant tax rebate for all motor vehicles whose energy consumption is less than 30 mpg. Require all electronic manufacturers to have their devices disconnect from the power net 15 minutes after the device is turned off. Offer tax credits for all home and business appliances that are below average in energy consumption. Allow tax credits for all passive solar energy saving means. Allow a 100% write off of any installed geothermal air conditioning and heating systems and provide tax write-offs for solar and wind produced electricity to homeowners.

In production we should force the DOE to produce policy that will once again foster the construction of nuclear electric energy plants. Force the environmentalists and Nevada residents to accept the nuclear waste depository at Yucca Mountain. Eliminate immediately all government subsidies to ethanol production. We should offer tax exception for ten years to anyone building and producing coal liquefaction production plants utilizing clean conversion technologies. We should offer tax credits for solar as well as wind electric energy production. Eliminate all tax write offs for the petrochemical industry over the next ten years at a rate of 10% per year. Offer American automotive producers a tax break for all energy saving car and truck model’s whose energy consumption is below half of the average consumption rate as of 2009. And lastly demand that the three huge oil fields in Alaska are accessed only for American domestic consumption and refining and build at least five new refineries.


What Is Proportional Representation?

Alex Carmichael | Proportional Representation (PR) is the voting systems used to elect a legislature at any level of government, such as a state assembly or town council. PR means that the number of seats won by a party or group of candidates is proportionate to the number of votes received. For example, under a PR voting system if 30% of voters support a particular party then roughly 30% of seats will be won by that party. PR is an alternative to voting systems based on single member districts like the U.S. congressional elections. PR systems tend to produce a proliferation of political parties, while single member districts encourage a two-party system. America’s non-PR system produces disproportionate outcomes and creates extreme bias in favor of the Democrats and Republicans.

PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION IN DETAIL

There are many different forms of proportional representation. The degree of proportionality varies; it is determined by factors such as the precise formula used to allocate seats, the number of seats in each constituency or in the elected body as a whole, and the level of any minimum threshold for election. The majority of debate about voting systems is about whether to move to more proportionality because the Democrats and Republicans in US elections can, and most often do, win formal control of legislatures with support from as little as 20-25% of eligible voters, at the cost of smaller parties.

Proportional RepresentationThe single non-transferable vote (STV) is a voting system designed to achieve proportional representation through preferential voting which does not depend on political parties. Voters rank candidates in order of preference. Under STV, an elector’s vote is initially allocated to his or her most preferred candidate, and then, after candidates have been either elected or eliminated, any surplus or unused votes are transferred according to the voter’s stated preferences. The system minimizes “wasted” votes, provides approximately proportional representation, and enables votes to be explicitly cast for individual candidates rather than for closed party lists. By example, elections for the Australian Senate use what is referred to as above-the-line voting where candidates for each party are grouped on the ballot, allowing the voter to vote for the group or for a candidate. It is most the commonly used PR system in English speaking world (Britain, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand). City elections in Cambridge, Massachusetts and in Minneapolis, Minnesota recently used PR.

Under PR, each constituency elects two or more representatives per electorate. Consequently the constituency is equivalent in size to the sum of single member constituencies that would produce the same number of representatives. Parties tend to offer as many candidates as they optimistically could expect to win: major parties nominate more than minor parties. Voters rank some or all candidates in order of their choice. A successful candidate must achieve a quota, which is “calculated by dividing the Total Valid Poll by one more than the number of seats to be filled, ignoring any remainder and then adding 1 vote.”
Only in a few cases is this achieved at the first count. For the second count, if a candidate wins election her/his surplus vote (in excess of the quota) is transferred to the voters’ second choices; otherwise, the least popular candidate is eliminated and those votes are redistributed according to the second preference shown on them. If more than one candidate cannot get enough votes after the transfer of votes of the least popular candidate, that candidate is also eliminated (as they would be eliminated on the next round anyway.) The process repeats until all seats are filled either when the required number of candidates achieve the quota or until the number of remaining candidates matches the number of remaining seats. Although the counting process is complicated, voting is clear and most voters get at least one of their preferences elected.

HOW CAN I HELP PROMOTE PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION IN AMERICA?

In promoting PR for governmental elections, the easiest place to begin is at the local level. Usually all it takes is a change in a city or county charter in order to adopt proportional representation. City governments regularly form committees to review their charters, and these are excellent opportunities for citizens to raise the option of using PR. City officials are sometimes reluctant to lead the way in this kind of change, and they may even try to impede it. So in many areas citizens may often have to organize themselves and offer referendums in order to reform their city charter. In recent years, citizens have put PR referendums on the ballot in Cincinnati and San Francisco. Both efforts narrowly went down to defeat, garnering 45% and 43% of the vote respectively.

The state level is also ripe for change. In many states, PR could be adopted without any change in the state constitution. A reasonable approach would be to work for PR in one house, leaving the other house elected by districts. But given the difficulties in organizing a state-wide campaign, promoters of PR should not jump too quickly into a referendum process without first taking the time to lay the political groundwork for such an effort. PR proponents must form an effective state-wide organization and build coalitions with other political groups. A premature effort that leads to defeat may permanently turn some people off to PR. In order to build support, citizens might want to first work for the establishment of a state commission to examine the voting system. This could provide a valuable forum for promoting the idea of PR and familiarizing the public with this issue.

Litigation is another way to promote the use of PR. City and state suits over voting rights issues provide an opportunity to introduce PR as a possible legal remedy in these cases. Working with the litigants or filing “friend of the court” briefs could at the very least lead to its inclusion in discussions of remedies. In one case in Maryland, a judge opted for a PR remedy after an activist sent him a good article on PR.

Obviously, the adoption of PR for U.S. congressional elections is an important goal for the pro-PR movement. But change at this level will be difficult. Although there are no constitutional obstacles to using PR for U.S. House elections, there is congressional legislation that mandates single-member districts. You could join the effort to repeal this legislation and allow states to use PR. The Center for Voting and Democracy in Washington, D.C. developed plans for Georgia and North Carolina that demonstrate how easy it would be to create multi-member PR districts for U.S. House elections. Importantly, such plans would not require a constitutional amendment. All that would be needed is to repeal a 1967 federal law requiring single-member district elections for the House, and several bills have been introduced in Congress that would do just that.

Given the many advantages of PR, it is not surprising that the general worldwide trend during the last 100 years has been away from winner-take-all voting systems and toward various forms of PR. That trend continues even today. The vast majority of newer democracies in Eastern Europe ended up rejecting American-style plurality voting in favor of various forms of proportional or semi-proportional voting systems. Comparative studies of European countries have shown much higher voter turnout, and less apathy towards the process, when PR is used to elect officials at the highest levels of government.


Sen. Tom McClintock’s Response to President Calderon

May 20, 2010 | Senator Tom McClintock delivered a blistering response to Mexico’s President Calderon’s address to Congress.

Mr. Speaker:

I rise to take strong exception to the speech of the President of Mexico while in this chamber today.

The Mexican government has made it very clear for many years that it holds American sovereignty in contempt and President Calderon’s behavior as a guest of the Congress confirms and underscores this attitude.

It is highly inappropriate for the President of Mexico to lecture Americans on American immigration law, just as it would be for Americans to lecture Mexico on its own laws.

It is obvious that President Calderon does not understand the nature of America or the purpose of our immigration law.

Unlike Mexico’s immigration law — which is brutally exclusionary — the purpose of America’s law is not to keep people out. It is to assure that as people come to the United States, they do so with the intention of becoming Americans and of raising their children as Americans.

Unlike Mexico, our nation embraces legal immigration and what makes that possible is assimilation.

A century ago President Teddy Roosevelt put it this way. He said:

“In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon this person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language, and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”

That is how we created one great nation from the people of all the nations of the world.

The largest group of immigrants now comes from Mexico. A recent RAND study discovered that during most of the 20th Century, while our immigration laws were actually enforced, assimilation worked and made possible the swift attainment of the American dream for millions of immigrants seeking to escape conditions of Mexico.

That is the broader meaning of our nation’s motto, E Pluribus Unum from many people, one people, the American people.

But there is now an element in our political structure that seeks to undermine that concept of E Pluribus Unum. It seeks to hyphenate Americans, to develop linguistic divisions, to assign rights and preferences based on race and ethnicity, and to elevate devotion to foreign ideologies and traditions, while at the same time denigrating American culture, American values, and American founding principles.

In order to do so, they know that they have to stop the process of assimilation. In order to do that, they have to undermine our immigration laws.

It is an outrage that a foreign head of state would appear in this chamber and actively seek to do so. And it is a disgrace that he would be cheered on from the left wing of the White House and by many Democrats here in Congress.

Arizona has not adopted a new immigration law. All it has done is to enforce existing law that President Obama refuses to enforce. It is hardly a radical policy to suggest that if an officer on a routine traffic stop encounters a driver with no driver’s license, no passport, and who doesn’t speak English, that maybe that individual might be here illegally.

And to those who say we must reform our immigration laws I reply that we don’t need to reform them we need to enforce them. Just as every other government does. Just as Mexico does.

Above all, this is a debate of, by and for the American people. If President Calderon wishes to participate in that debate, I invite him to obey our immigration laws, apply for citizenship, do what 600,000 LEGAL immigrants to our nation are doing right now, learn our history and our customs, and become an American. And then he will have every right to participate in that debate.

Until then, I would politely invite him to have the courtesy while a guest of this Congress to abide by the fundamental rules of diplomacy between civilized nations not to meddle in each others domestic debates.


Top