By Nicholas Stix | On August 16’s Day of Infamy, Barack Obama’s unconstitutional Administrative Amnesty of illegal alien invaders began processing, with minimal opposition from the GOP. It will privilege millions of criminals, and create an ever-burgeoning class of legally privileged people who are being taught that America’s laws—and not just her immigration laws—do not apply to them.
As of 2011, the U.S. Census Bureau claims that there are just under 52 million Hispanic “residents” in the U.S.—illegal aliens, legal immigrants, and citizens—16.7 percent of the population. (The Bureau’s practice of counting “residents,” rather than American citizens, is itself a form of psychological amnesty indicative of the corruption that has burrowed deep into the body politic over the past 40-odd years—resulting, among other evils, in the creation of Congressional “rotten boroughs” frequently held by Reconquistas.)
By definition, all illegal aliens have contempt for the American legal system. Tolerating them creates what economists call “moral hazard,” inviting further law breaking.
And that’s exactly what we get. Having violated our borders and immigration laws illegal aliens commit identity theft (the fastest growing class of crime), tax evasion, and EITC and SSI fraud; and allow their sons to join violent criminal gangs, where they commit robberies, larceny, auto theft, sell false documents, deal drugs, commit gang rape, vandalism, murder, attack policemen, and riot.
Not merely the “50, 000,” “one million,” or “two million” illegals who benefit from this Administrative Amnesty (the estimate keeps rising), but tens of millions over the next 30 years, through both legal and fraudulent chain migration, new anchor babies, and Obama’s dog-whistling to future illegals, are getting the message that America’s borders and immigration laws—in other words, America—have been abolished.
This did not start with Obama. But he has taken it to a level never before seen—because he shares illegal aliens’ hatred of white America.
But first, let’s review the pre-Obama attack on the rule of law.
The problems began in the 1970s, when cities adopted “sanctuary” policies—e.g., the notorious Los Angeles “Special Order 40,” under the regime of Chief Daryl Gates, of 1992 black L.A. riot notoriety. They harbored illegal aliens in violation of federal law, while the federal government turned a blind eye. (Contrast the Obama Regime’s attack on Arizona for wanting to enforce federal law.)
Right there, when you order law enforcement officers, on pain of losing their jobs, to violate federal immigration laws, you turn the police into criminals and undermine the rule of law. That then causes cascading criminality and non-feasance, as the news is communicated through the ranks of cops and criminal invaders alike that the law is a joke.
Chiefs like Daryl Gates should have been arrested.
Los Angeles Police Department officials developed a talking point, which their colleagues across the country parroted: while they were not enforcing immigration law, they were vigorously enforcing non-immigration law. But this lie soon became transparent .
The official LAPD rule for over 30 years has been to check the immigration status of those suspected of violating non-immigration ordinances and laws. But the LAPD has for many years failed to enforce its own rule— even when a Spanish-speaker driving drunk without a license kills someone! The rot extended so far that in 2003 carpetbagger LAPD Chief William Bratton announced to law-abiding Los Angelenos who complained about his refusal to enforce immigration laws that if they didn’t like it, they should leave the state!
S.O. 40 resulted in the LAPD, the California Highway Patrol and other police agencies elsewhere legally privileging offenders who claimed to speak only Spanish and had no legal ID by ceasing to enforce non-immigration laws that illegal aliens typically violate: Driving without a license, with a suspended license, without insurance, etc.
LAPD and other police chiefs contended that their illegal sanctuary policy made illegal aliens comfortable enough to come forward to report crimes. The opposite was true. The police ceded sovereignty over more and more territory to cut-throat illegal alien gangs. Non-gang members knew that reporting crimes could cost them their lives.
Bratton reveled in his deception, bragging that he had dramatically driven down crime. But all he had done was exempt one million or more “residents” from most laws, cause most crime victims to refrain from reporting crimes, and rely on the cynicism that illegals had brought with them. (Some 90 percent of felonies in Mexico go unreported)..
My colleague, Federale, has shown how lawlessness have similarly wormed its way through the federal bureaucracy, so that officials have for decades been in effect amnestying illegal aliens, and even paying SSI to illegals! Almost 20 years ago, immigration law enforcement officers were ordered to stop chasing suspected illegal aliens. More recently, the Obama Administration has ordered them not to arrest even fugitive illegal aliens, or aliens who have feloniously assaulted them. In case anyone considered putting his oath of service above political corruption, officers have been threatened with being fired for doing their job, and some have been persecuted and even falsely imprisoned (though the last case was by the Bush II regime).
Why would Obama want to encourage lawlessness? It is because he believes in the rule of crime—as long as it is the rule of black, Hispanic and other non-white criminals over whites.
At present, officially at least 91 million U.S. “residents”—52 million Hispanics and 39 million blacks—constitute irredentist groups who are being encouraged to believe that “the white man’s laws” do not apply to them. Moslem immigrants feel likewise. And the celebration of such groups by America’s cultural elite causes millions of whites to descend to the same level.
Obama has supported black criminals his entire political career. Back in the early 2000s, when he represented Chicago in the Illinois State Senate, he sponsored legislation banning the “racial profiling” of blacks—opposing “racial profiling” has never been anything but a euphemism for the support of black felons. Before and since the 2008 election, Obama has supported every black race hoax to come down the pike: The Jena Hoax, the Henry Louis “Skip” Gates Jr. Hoax, the Trayvon Martin Hoax.
On Election Day, 2008, the Nation of Islam’s New Black Panther Party was videotaped at a Philadelphia polling place, violating whites’ voting rights. The Bush Justice Department pressed charges, and the case seemed won by default when the defendants did not even bother showing up. And yet the Obama-Eric Holder Justice Department dropped all but one of the charges—leaving one that resulted merely in the NBPP being ordered to obey the law, which it was supposed to do in the first place.
Obama’s support of the NOI/NBPP, and for the violation of whites’ voting rights, was clear from his intervention on the former’s behalf. Later, a 2007 picture surfaced of Obama campaigning together with NBPP leader Malik Zulu Shabazz, and Shabazz was reportedly a guest of Obama’s at the White House, shortly after the inauguration.
Obama has ignored the nationwide racist black lynch mob violence that greeted his election and has not subsided since, but is seeking anew to handcuff police departments.
Obama’s behavior should not surprise anyone who knows of his longstanding beliefs and history.
It is often reported that Obama moved to Chicago to follow in the footsteps of its first black mayor, Harold Washington. But I have a different take.
At the time of Obama’s move, Chicago was already one of America’s most violent cities, and the national capital of black street gangs.
The Nation of Islam murder cult is based in Chicago. Beginning in the 1960s, first in Harlem, the NOI engaged in the serial murder of whites. From circa 1970-1975, NOI death squads murdered anywhere from 71 to over 270 whites in California, at least six whites in Oklahoma City and, according to the FBI, was also active murdering whites on the East Coast.
Obama was a member, for over 20 years, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Trinity United Church of Christ. Among other things, Wright asserted that AIDS was invented by the U.S. government as part of a genocidal white plot to murder blacks.
Black Liberation Theology is not a Christian sect. It worships not Jesus as the Christ, but blackness and genocide. Its founder, James H. Cone, combined Marxism and genocidal black supremacy.
“Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community
“… Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.”[James Cone, quoted in Obama Pastor’s Theology: Destroy the White Enemy, World Net Daily, March 17, 2008.]
Remember that, during Obama’s 2008 campaign, in an underexposed interview, Obama expressed his position that every black from every country (e.g., Caribbean) that ever had slavery, and everyone from any country that had ever been a colony of any white country, has an eternal right to enjoy eternal racial privilege, at whites’ expense. That would make for several billion people.
Farai Chideya [Born in Baltimore, African father]: Let me throw a little curveball in there. We met when I was an undergrad at Harvard. You were the head of the Harvard Law Review. Now there’s a big debate at Harvard over whether the children of immigrants — and you’re one, and I’m one, for the purposes of these studies — should be considered the same as children of Jim Crow survivors, the great-grandchildren of people who survived slavery. What do you think about that and how that plays into affirmative action?
Obama: Oh, I think that’s a divisive debate and a silly debate that we should not be getting into. Listen, your parents or grandparents, my parents or grandparents were either part of the black Diaspora. I mean, you know, black people didn’t end up in the Caribbean by taking a yacht there. They came on slave ships. Back in Africa, my grandfather was a cook for the British army and suffered under the colonialism there. You know, the notion that we would try to parse and divide to see who among us has been most victimized, I think, is not an appropriate approach to take. And it weakens rather than strengthens the overall efforts to ensure racial equality and justice in this country.[Links added] ][Obama on the War, Race and America’s Future, by Farai Chideya, NPR, July 13, 2007]
My charge: Obama seeks to dispossess and disenfranchise, if not ultimately to physically destroy, the historic American people—just as his allies are doing to whites in South Africa and Zimbabwe
Obama wages War on White America “by any means necessary.” Administrative Amnesty is merely the latest example.
Nicholas Stix [email him] is a New York City-based journalist and researcher, much of whose work focuses on the nexus of race, crime, and education. He spent much of the 1990s teaching college in New York and New Jersey. His work has appeared in Chronicles, The New York Post, Weekly Standard, Daily News, New York Newsday, American Renaissance, Academic Questions, Ideas on Liberty and many other publications. Stix was the project director and principal author of the NPI report, The State of White America-2007. He blogs at Nicholas Stix, Uncensored.