Subscribe via RSS Feed

Supreme Court on Verge of Banning Affirmative Action

Breitbart News is reporting that in the education case of Fisher v. University of Texas, a Supreme Court majority appears ready to strike down affirmative action because “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”

Affirmative Action BanThe U.S. Supreme Court, in the pivotal test of affirmative action in education, will hear arguments on December 9 for the second time that Abigail Noel Fisher was discriminated against by the University of Texas in her application to attend law school.

A blanket ruling outlawing racial and ethnic preferences entirely would follow Chief Justice John Roberts’ 2007 dictum “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” from the opinion in the 4-1-4 vote case of Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1.

The Court at the time applied a framework of “strict scrutiny” to find the public high school district’s racial tiebreaker plan unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Justice Clarence Thomas has steadfastly supported a ban on affirmative action, but swing voter Justice Anthony Kennedy has consistently upheld the validity of the theory of affirmative action, even if he has voted to strike down specific practices as unconstitutional.

Texas already uses a technique that should avoid any discrimination by accepting applicants who are in the top 10 percent of any accredited high school operated in the state. Given there are plenty of poor schools dominated by minorities, that should have guaranteed a high percentage of minority students have the same chance of admission as white students from wealthy school districts.

But Texas applicants who don’t make it in under the top 10 percent program are evaluated through a second, “holistic review” that is the focus of the case.

The Supreme Court was expected to strike down holistic review the first time Fisher v. University of Texas came to the court. But Justice Kennedy negotiated a deal to send the case back to the Fifth Circuit with instructions to apply stricter scrutiny to the details, according to Forbes.

Surprisingly, the Fifth Circuit approved the University of Texas’ holistic review a second time. Abigail Noel Fisher then appealed again, setting the stage for the potential end of affirmative action.

The arch supporter of affirmative action of the Supreme Court is expected to be Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a child of Puerto Rican immigrants who won acceptance and a full scholarship to Princeton based at least partially on affirmative action. In Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, she stated: “Race matters because of the slights, the snickers, the silent judgments that reinforce that most crippling of thoughts: `I do not belong here.’”

Justice Kennedy, in the first Fisher v. University of Texas, wrote, “The reviewing court must ultimately be satisfied that no workable race neutral alternatives would produce the educational benefits of diversity.”

But the potential constitutional flaw in the University of Texas affirmative action program is that it is so opaque that admission officials cannot define what role race played in any specific admission that could advance the “educational benefits of diversity” for all students.

Texas admissions officers grade individual students on their academic performance and test scores. But they also grade on “personal achievement,” that includes race. The two scores are then averaged to determine competitive rank for acceptance.

Andrew Grossman, a partner in Baker Hostetler in Washington DC office, told Forbes that, “They’ve designed this program quite deliberately to be unaccountable and non-transparent.” He added, “The hallmark of strict scrutiny is the court has to satisfy itself the program is narrowly tailored and achieves the government’s objectives.”

Bob Whitaker 2016

“Diverse” means formerly White… –Bob Whitaker

Bob Whitaker: A true American and former Reagan Administration appointee.

Political Power for European Americans!

European people should organize and advance their own interests just like every other group. Join our fight for Heritage and Identity!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to or click here:

The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!

Support American Freedom Party growth and our heritage of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.

Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party! Political Power for European-Americans!

European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Category: American Voice, Establishment News

Comments (1)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. bluchersvictory says:

    Yaaaaawn. Even if the Supreme Court "bans' affirmative action does anybody really believe it will change anything? The corrupt government will find ways to get around a so called ban and continue to hire and promote incompetent people just because they fall into a certain category while denying competent people jobs. Is anybody surprised that the country has gone down hill since all the affirmative action employees are controlling the reins of power?